From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kostja@tarantool.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:22:35 +0300
From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Put all new rows to the
 end of journal request
Message-ID: <20190307112235.GJ5263@chai>
References: <cover.1551902962.git.georgy@tarantool.org>
 <2134b8fca0963ebd0a8fb818a66cd05e81ef09a6.1551902962.git.georgy@tarantool.org>
 <20190307103813.GF5263@chai>
 <20190307105321.ru5lpevqnuvg4b6u@esperanza>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190307105321.ru5lpevqnuvg4b6u@esperanza>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Georgy Kirichenko <georgy@tarantool.org>
List-ID: <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>

* Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [19/03/07 13:57]:
> > txn->n_rows[stmt->replica_id == instance_id] ++;
> 
> TBO I find it hackish.
> 
> n_remote_rows / n_rows looks much easier for understanding IMO.

It's n_local_rows and n_remote_rows then. Why do we need the total
and the partial sum then?


-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov