From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:09:33 +0300 From: Vladimir Davydov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fix fiber_join() hang in case fiber_cancel() was called Message-ID: <20190206140933.ses3gvmayt3u3d4c@esperanza> References: <20190206125630.58091-1-sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190206125630.58091-1-sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> To: Serge Petrenko Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:56:30PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: > In case a fiber joining another fiber gets cancelled, it stays suspended > forever and never finishes joining. This happens because fiber_cancel() > wakes the fiber and removes it from all execution queues. > Fix this by adding the fiber back to the wakeup queue of the joined > fiber after each yield. > > Closes #3948 > --- > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3948 > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/sp/gh-3948-fiber-cancel-during-join > > Changes in v3: > - rewrote the test with fiber channel > to remove scheduler dependency. > - went back to ignoring cancellation > till join is complete. > > Changes in v2: > - rewrote the test completely. > - instead of continuing to join if the fiber > is cancelled make the fiber to be joined > non-joinable and exit. This solution was > discussed verbally. > - revert comment changes for fiber_yield(). > It really isn't a cancellation point. > > src/fiber.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > test/app/fiber.result | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > test/app/fiber.test.lua | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/fiber.c b/src/fiber.c > index 6f3d0ab78..70e992f13 100644 > --- a/src/fiber.c > +++ b/src/fiber.c > @@ -392,9 +392,17 @@ fiber_join(struct fiber *fiber) > assert(fiber->flags & FIBER_IS_JOINABLE); > > if (! fiber_is_dead(fiber)) { > - rlist_add_tail_entry(&fiber->wake, fiber(), state); > - > do { > + /* > + * In case fiber is cancelled during yield > + * it will be remoed from wake queue by a > + * wakeup following the cancel, so we have > + * to put it back in. > + * Having multiple queue entries for the > + * same fiber doesn't hurt, since wakeup > + * is executed only once per fiber. > + */ > + rlist_add_tail_entry(&fiber->wake, fiber(), state); I removed the second paragraph of the comment, because it's confusing, and pushed the patch to 2.1 and 1.10.