From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 7D71D241C5 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 03:57:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_huSKnLm8eR for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 03:57:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpng3.m.smailru.net (smtpng3.m.smailru.net [94.100.177.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 3C9B023FDA for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 03:57:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:57:33 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] sql: fix lemon memory leak reported by ASAN Message-ID: <20190109085733.2gq2c6ru6wrxahav@tkn_work_nb> References: <9dbcaa3afae39cc46a8e6da5e00b5d62179ed016.1546692811.git.alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> <20190109072015.gruplrs6gyrcu66w@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190109072015.gruplrs6gyrcu66w@tarantool.org> Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Kirill Yukhin Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Nikita Pettik On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:20:15AM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote: > Hello, > On 05 Jan 16:13, Alexander Turenko wrote: > > It catched by ASAN at build time (lemon is executed to generate > > parse.[ch]), so tarantool couldn't be built with -DENABLE_ASAN=ON. > > --- > > > > no issue > > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/Totktonada/fix-lemon-memleak > I've pushed your patch into 2.1 branch. > > Should we propose a patch to SQLite? It is not so important unless you are using ASAN and I think in SQLite it only run in the maintainer mode. SQLite requires to sign-off dedication document before contribute. The patch I think is not enough reason to do that. WBR, Alexander Turenko.