From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 656602BD74 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:06:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k6O7ApxA8bAo for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:06:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp60.i.mail.ru (smtp60.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 126C12B322 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:06:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:06:23 +0300 From: Alexander Turenko Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sql: LIKE & GLOB pattern comparison issue Message-ID: <20181114170623.bxxbn3qy4lsn642w@tkn_work_nb> References: <58B407E2-AF5D-4531-A9FF-9DC57CE0070B@tarantool.org> <860a125b-19f3-3bf1-8705-25156ff508ab@tarantool.org> <45338A27-C589-4330-B206-A4E379A4DE75@tarantool.org> <20181021035140.avx6d3rokx5ta6hi@tkn_work_nb> <6740948F-6C40-4C0F-B237-7C3573225FBC@tarantool.org> <20181029130123.f254chdxxuwi6c4w@tkn_work_nb> <3D4337BA-F528-425C-B352-C195C20DA282@tarantool.org> <20181101103045.fmhy3y6l342wojd6@tkn_work_nb> <8C50679E-91D6-436B-BB27-39A45A14106D@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8C50679E-91D6-436B-BB27-39A45A14106D@tarantool.org> Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: "n.pettik" Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Nikita Tatunov On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 05:16:49PM +0300, n.pettik wrote: > Hello, guys. > > I suggest following diff. It doesn’t involve any functional changes. > Obviously, as far as bug has been fixed, patch LGTM. > It is up to you whether discard my fixes or apply them. > I pushed fixes to the separate branch, since I had to solve > rebase conflicts after adding my fixes. > > np/gh-3251-where-like-hangs > I don't have objections against your changes. WBR, Alexander Turenko.