From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 6D92E27DAC for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:17:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0omQNoh-PZgZ for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:17:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp63.i.mail.ru (smtp63.i.mail.ru [217.69.128.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTPS id 207F727D96 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:53:41 +0300 From: Kirill Yukhin Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] sql: get rid off tnum field of struct Table Message-ID: <20180720165341.bjdtrq5ajmrsc7z5@tarantool.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: tarantool-patches-bounce@freelists.org Reply-To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: tarantool-patches List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: korablev@tarantool.org Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Hello, On 20 июл 14:37, Kirill Yukhin wrote: > Basic structures (struct Table/Index) of legacy SQL's data > dictionary used to so-called tnum to refer to engine's > btree structures. Tarantool used this field to store composition > of space_id and index_id. Recently both structures incorporated > native space_def/index_def descriptors. > This patch finally removes tnum field. It also refactors > init_callback machinery, removing varargs from declarations. > > Closes #3482 > --- > Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3482 > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/commits/kyukhin/gh-3482-remove-tnum I've checked the patch into 2.0 branch. -- Regards, Kirill Yukhin