From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kostja@tarantool.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:51:45 +0300
From: Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] memtx: embed light hash into memtx_hash_index
Message-ID: <20180522135145.GF11201@atlas>
References: <cover.1526987033.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
 <b588d94bb63fe11c49bae81b66ef547d98b4a24f.1526987033.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b588d94bb63fe11c49bae81b66ef547d98b4a24f.1526987033.git.vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
List-ID: <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>

* Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> [18/05/22 15:10]:
> No point in this level of indirection. We embed bps tree implementation
> into memtx_tree_index, why don't we do the same in case of hash index.
> A good side effect is that we can now define iterators in headers for
> both memtx_tree_index and memtx_hash_index, which is required to improve
> memtx garbage collection mechanism.

OK to push.


-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia, +7 903 626 22 32
http://tarantool.io - www.twitter.com/kostja_osipov