Hi, Sergey! Thanks for updating the test! LGTM. -- Best regards, Evgeniy Temirgaleev > > From: Sergey Kaplun > To: Evgeniy Temirgaleev > Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, Sergey Bronnikov > > Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 8:04 PM +03:00 > Evgeniy, > > On 29.07.26, Evgeniy Temirgaleev wrote: > > Hi, Sergey! > > Please, consider the idea about marking the tests with special build > options. > > Fixed your comment and force-pushed the branch. > > > > > > > I thinks it will be better to include such information to the test’s > code in a some way. > > For example, we can add comments to the code, which we expect to fail > with ASAN checks. Also, we can add mark to the corresponding test > condition messages with ‘ASAN’ to reflect this in the test reports. > > Good idea! I've added the ASAN tag in the test description as you > suggested and added the corresponding comment. > > =================================================================== > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1451-ffi-packed-bitfield.test.lua > b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1451-ffi-packed-bitfield.test.lua > index 76483b0d..8b4e5ce8 100644 > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1451-ffi-packed-bitfield.test.lua > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1451-ffi-packed-bitfield.test.lua > @@ -28,10 +28,13 @@ test:plan(5) > > local packed = ffi.new('packed_struct') > > -test:is(packed.bitfield, 0, 'correct 0-initialization') > +-- Check that there is no heap overflow for the packed FFI > +-- structure. That read/write access leads to the failure when > +-- LuaJIT is built with ASAN support. > +test:is(packed.bitfield, 0, 'ASAN: correct 0-initialization') > > packed.bitfield = 1 > -test:is(packed.bitfield, 1, 'bitfield set correctly') > +test:is(packed.bitfield, 1, 'ASAN: bitfield set correctly') > > -- Check correct structure layout. > local byteoffset, bitpos, bitsize = ffi.offsetof('packed_struct2', > 'bitfield16') > =================================================================== > > Branch is force-pushed. > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Evgeniy Temirgaleev > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey Kaplun >