Hi, Sergey!

Thanks for your updates and for your answers, LGTM.

--
Best regards,
Evgeniy Temirgaleev

> 
> From: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
> To: Evgeniy Temirgaleev <e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org>
> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org
> >
> Date: Sunday, June 28, 2026 7:33 PM +03:00
> Hi, Evgeniy!
> Thanks for the review!
> See my answers below.
> 
> Branch is force-pushed with the fixes.
> 
> On 28.06.26, Evgeniy Temirgaleev wrote:
> > Hi, Sergey!
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. Please, see my comments.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Evgeniy Temirgaleev
> >
> > >
> > > От кого: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
> > > Кому: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>, Evgeniy Temirgaleev <e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org
> 
> > > >
> > > Копия: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org
> 
> > > >
> > > Дата: Четверг, 25 июня 2026, 23:29 +03:00
> > > This patch adds dumpers for a single IR instruction (`lj-ir`), as well
> 
> > > as for all bytecodes inside one trace (`lj-trace`). Its dump is quite
> > > similar to the -jdump flag but also reports types of register operands
> 
> > > (`ref`, `lit`, `cst`) and operation mode (`N`, `A`, `W`, etc.).
> > > The `lj-trace` command accepts optional /rs flags to dump registers
> > > associated with IR and snapshots for the trace correspondingly.
> > > The `lj-ir` command can be used for dumping IR constants as well.
> > > The `lj-jslots` command dumps the content of `J->slot`. It is useful
> to
> > > simplify debugging of `rec_check_slots()` assertion failures.
> > >
> > > For LLDB value, the `__getitem__` metamethod now accepts bool keys.
> > > Also, `__index__` is set to allow lldb.value to be used as an index
> > > without explicit conversion to int. Old GDB versions (below 7.12) are
> > > not supported because of the gdb.Value lacks the `__index__`
> metamethod
> > > and can't be monkey-patched. The support for these versions may be
> added
> > > by demand.
> > >
> > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#4808
> > > ---
> > > src/luajit_dbg.py | 1216 ++++++++++++++++-
> > > .../debug-extension-tests.py | 365 +++++
> > > 2 files changed, 1570 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> > > index 2edb199a..fd6ca8a5 100644
> > > --- a/src/luajit_dbg.py
> > > +++ b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> 
> <snipped>
> 
> > > + if tp.GetTypeClass() == lldb.eTypeClassStruct:
> > > + len_fields = tp.GetNumberOfFields()
> > > + for n_field in range(len_fields):
> > > + islast = n_field == (len_fields - 1)
> > > + field = tp.GetFieldAtIndex(n_field)
> > > + start_field = field.GetOffsetInBytes()
> > > + if not islast:
> > > + end_field = tp.GetFieldAtIndex(
> > > + n_field + 1
> > > + ).GetOffsetInBytes()
> > > + else:
> > > + end_field = tp.GetByteSize()
> > > + if start_field <= offset and offset < end_field:
> > > + next_name = self.member_by_offset(
> > > + field.GetType(),
> > > + offset - start_field,
> > > + prev_name=field.GetName()
> > > + )
> > > + return '.{field}{suffix}'.format(
> > > + field=field.GetName(),
> > > + suffix=next_name if next_name else ''
> > > + )
> > > + if tp.GetTypeClass() == lldb.eTypeClassArray:
> > >
> >
> > Typo?: elif
> 
> Fixed, thanks!
> 
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> index 62cd65d5..3b7cf7a1 100644
> --- a/src/luajit_dbg.py
> +++ b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ class _LLDBDebugger(Debugger):
> field=field.GetName(),
> suffix=next_name if next_name else ''
> )
> - if tp.GetTypeClass() == lldb.eTypeClassArray:
> + elif tp.GetTypeClass() == lldb.eTypeClassArray:
> # Get array field type.
> target = tp.GetArrayElementType()
> tsize = target.GetByteSize()
> ===================================================================
> 
> <snipped>
> 
> > > +# Mode bits: Commutative, {Normal/Ref, Alloc, Load, Store},
> > > +# Non-weak guard. */
> > >
> >
> > Typo: C comment end */
> 
> Removed, thanks!
> 
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> index 62cd65d5..3b7cf7a1 100644
> @@ -1612,12 +1612,16 @@ IRS = [
> 
> 
> # Mode bits: Commutative, {Normal/Ref, Alloc, Load, Store},
> -# Non-weak guard. */
> +# Non-weak guard.
> IRM_C = 0x10
> IRM_A = 0x20
> IRM_L = 0x40
> ===================================================================
> 
> >
> > >
> > > +IRM_C = 0x10
> > > +IRM_A = 0x20
> > > +IRM_L = 0x40
> > > +IRM_S = 0x60
> > > +IRM_W = 0x80
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +# IR operand mode (2 bit).
> > > +IRM = [
> > > + 'ref',
> > > + 'lit',
> > > + 'cst',
> > > + '', # none
> > > +]
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +lj_ir_mode_ = None
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def lj_ir_mode():
> > > + global lj_ir_mode_
> > > + if lj_ir_mode_:
> > > + return lj_ir_mode_
> > > + lj_ir_mode_ = dbg.lookup_global('lj_ir_mode')
> > > + return lj_ir_mode_
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def ir_left(op):
> > > + return IRM[int(lj_ir_mode()[op] & 3)]
> > >
> >
> > May be binary constant will be more clear? xxx & 0b0011
> 
> I prefer to leave it consistent with the original sources, see
> <src/lj_ir.h>. Also, the bc decoding has the same format.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def ir_right(op):
> > > + return IRM[int(lj_ir_mode()[op] >> 2 & 3)]
> > >
> >
> > May be binary constant will be more clear? (xxx & 0b1100) >> 2
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def ir_mode(op):
> > > + mode = ''
> > > + ir_mode = int(lj_ir_mode()[op] ^ IRM_W)
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > + if ir_mode == IRM_C:
> > > + mode = 'C'
> > > + elif ir_mode == IRM_A:
> > > + mode = 'A'
> > > + elif ir_mode == IRM_L:
> > > + mode = 'L'
> > > + elif ir_mode == IRM_S:
> > > + mode = 'S'
> > > + else:
> > > + mode = 'N'
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > + mode += 'W' if ir_mode & IRM_W else ''
> > >
> >
> > May be table with 16 items and comments will be more clear? E. g. return
> XXX[(lj_ir_mode()[op] & 0b11110000) >> 4]
> > And it will contain invalid values also.
> > # <flag bits in a comment>
> > XXX[0b0000] = ‘NW’ # Normal/Ref | !Non-weak guard
> > XXX[0b0001] = ‘CW’ # Commutative | !Non-weak guard
> > XXX[0b0011] = ‘Invalid’
> > ...
> > XXX[0b1000] = ‘N’ # Normal/Ref | Non-weak guard
> > XXX[0b1001] = ‘C’ # Commutative | Non-weak guard
> > XXX[0b1011] = ‘Invalid’
> > ...
> 
> Rewrote with table usage as the following:
> Also, you help me to notice that the original implementation was
> incorrect (due to bits of operand modes after xor). Tests was corrupted
> as well, fixed. Thanks!
> 
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> index d4f89eb5..32b0cea7 100644
> --- a/src/luajit_dbg.py
> +++ b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> @@ -1613,11 +1613,15 @@ IRS = [
> 
> # Mode bits: Commutative, {Normal/Ref, Alloc, Load, Store},
> # Non-weak guard.
> -IRM_C = 0x10
> -IRM_A = 0x20
> -IRM_L = 0x40
> -IRM_S = 0x60
> -IRM_W = 0x80
> +IRM_BITS_W = 0x80
> +IRM_BITS = {
> + 0x00: 'N',
> + 0x10: 'C',
> + 0x20: 'A',
> + 0x40: 'L',
> + 0x60: 'S',
> +}
> +IRM_BITS_MASK = 0x70
> 
> 
> # IR operand mode (2 bit).
> @@ -1649,19 +1653,10 @@ def ir_right(op):
> 
> 
> def ir_mode(op):
> - mode = ''
> - ir_mode = int(lj_ir_mode()[op] ^ IRM_W)
> - if ir_mode == IRM_C:
> - mode = 'C'
> - elif ir_mode == IRM_A:
> - mode = 'A'
> - elif ir_mode == IRM_L:
> - mode = 'L'
> - elif ir_mode == IRM_S:
> - mode = 'S'
> - else:
> - mode = 'N'
> - mode += 'W' if ir_mode & IRM_W else ''
> + irmode = int((lj_ir_mode()[op]))
> + isweak = not bool(irmode & IRM_BITS_W)
> + mode = IRM_BITS[irmode & IRM_BITS_MASK]
> + mode += 'W' if isweak else ''
> return mode
> 
> 
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
> b/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
> index 8e069fe0..f17de27e 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
> +++ b/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
> @@ -530,12 +530,12 @@ class TestLJTraceBase(TestCaseBase):
> r'\t*proto: ' + RX_ADDR + r'\n' +
> r'\t*BC: ' + RX_ADDR + r'\n' +
> r'---- TRACE IR\n' +
> - RX_IRN + r'\s+ int SLOAD \[N \] lit: #[12] lit: C?I\n' +
> + RX_IRN + r'\s+ int SLOAD \[L \] lit: #[12] lit: C?I\n' +
> RX_IRN + r'\s+ \+ int ADD \[C \] ref: ' + RX_IRN +
> r' ref: integer 1\n' +
> RX_IRN + r'\s+ > int LE \[N \] ref: ' + RX_IRN +
> r' ref: integer 4\n' +
> - RX_IRN + r'\s+ > --- LOOP \[N \]\s*\n' +
> + RX_IRN + r'\s+ > --- LOOP \[S \]\s*\n' +
> RX_IRN + r'\s+ \+ int ADD \[C \] ref: ' + RX_IRN +
> r' ref: integer 1\n' +
> RX_IRN + r'\s+ > int LE \[N \] ref: ' + RX_IRN +
> ===================================================================
> 
> But intentionally didn't use bit notation to be consistent with original
> declarations in <src/lj_ir.h>. I've used the mask to strip lower bits
> related to "NonWeak" guard and operand modes.
> 
> <snipped>
> 
> > > +# Don't use *[ to be compatible with Python 2.
> > > +REGISTERS = {'x64': [
> > > + 'rax',
> > > + 'rcx',
> > > + 'rdx',
> > > + 'rbx',
> > > + 'rsp',
> > > + 'rbp',
> > > + 'rsi',
> > > + 'rdi',
> > > +] + [
> > > + 'r{}'.format(i) for i in range(8, 16) # r8 .. r15
> > > +] + [
> > > + 'xmm{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 16) # xmm0 .. xmm15
> > > +], 'arm64': [
> > > + 'x{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 31) # x0 .. x30
> > > +] + ['sp'] + [ # x31
> > > + 'd{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 32) # d0 .. d31
> > > +]}
> > >
> >
> > It seems, the ‘arm64’ registers are missed.
> 
> Actiually no, but I understand your confusion.
> Reformated as the following:
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> index 32b0cea7..a79caad0 100644
> --- a/src/luajit_dbg.py
> +++ b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> @@ -1728,24 +1728,29 @@ IRFPMS = [
> 
> 
> # Don't use *[ to be compatible with Python 2.
> -REGISTERS = {'x64': [
> - 'rax',
> - 'rcx',
> - 'rdx',
> - 'rbx',
> - 'rsp',
> - 'rbp',
> - 'rsi',
> - 'rdi',
> -] + [
> - 'r{}'.format(i) for i in range(8, 16) # r8 .. r15
> -] + [
> - 'xmm{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 16) # xmm0 .. xmm15
> -], 'arm64': [
> - 'x{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 31) # x0 .. x30
> -] + ['sp'] + [ # x31
> - 'd{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 32) # d0 .. d31
> -]}
> +REGISTERS = {
> + 'x64': [
> + 'rax',
> + 'rcx',
> + 'rdx',
> + 'rbx',
> + 'rsp',
> + 'rbp',
> + 'rsi',
> + 'rdi',
> + ] + [
> + 'r{}'.format(i) for i in range(8, 16) # r8 .. r15
> + ] + [
> + 'xmm{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 16) # xmm0 .. xmm15
> + ],
> + 'arm64': [
> + 'x{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 31) # x0 .. x30
> + ] + [
> + 'sp' # x31
> + ] + [
> + 'd{}'.format(i) for i in range(0, 32) # d0 .. d31
> + ]
> +}
> 
> 
> IR_CALLS = [
> ===================================================================
> 
> >
> 
> <snipped>
> 
> > > +def litname_xload(mode):
> > > + flags = ['-', 'R', 'V', 'RV', 'U', 'RU', 'VU', 'RVU']
> > >
> >
> > Does we need a range check as in litname_bufhdr()?
> 
> I prefer error raising if something goes wrong here (invalid IR or
> incorrect extension implementation).
> 
> >
> > >
> > > + return flags[mode]
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def litname_conv(mode):
> > >
> >
> > Does we need some range checking here?
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> >
> > >
> 
> <snippped>
> 
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def irt_ismarked(t):
> > > + return t['irt'] & IRT_MARK
> > >
> >
> > I propose explicit bool cast (!= 0) here and below.
> 
> Added:
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> index a79caad0..6b0827d9 100644
> --- a/src/luajit_dbg.py
> +++ b/src/luajit_dbg.py
> @@ -1978,15 +1978,15 @@ def tref_ref(tr):
> 
> 
> def irt_ismarked(t):
> - return t['irt'] & IRT_MARK
> + return bool(t['irt'] & IRT_MARK)
> 
> 
> def irt_isphi(t):
> - return t['irt'] & IRT_ISPHI
> + return bool(t['irt'] & IRT_ISPHI)
> 
> 
> def irt_isguard(t):
> - return t['irt'] & IRT_GUARD
> + return bool(t['irt'] & IRT_GUARD)
> 
> 
> def irt_toitype(irt):
> ===================================================================
> 
> >
> > >
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def irt_isphi(t):
> > > + return t['irt'] & IRT_ISPHI
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +def irt_isguard(t):
> > > + return t['irt'] & IRT_GUARD
> > > +
> > > +
> 
> <snipped>
> 
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.54.0
> > >
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey Kaplun
>