Hi!
Thanks for the review!
> 
>>Hi, Max!
>>Thanks for the fixes!
>>
>>LGTM, with a minor reminder below.
>>I suppose, that Sergey concerned about test name in the `test:ok()`
>>routine.
>>
>>On 14.07.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>> Thanks for the review!
>>> Added a comment with the test description, the branch is force-pushed.
>>> Here is the diff for the test description:
>>> ==============================================
>>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua
>>> index 6a49cec8..65ba0f28 100644
>>> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua
>>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,46 @@ test:plan(NITERATIONS)
>>>  local ffi = require('ffi')
>>>  local union_type = ffi.typeof('union { uint32_t u; float f; }')
>>>  
>>> +-- Before the patch, the `union_type` call resulted in the
>>> +-- initialization of both the integer and the float members
>>> +-- of the union, leading to undefined behavior since the
>>> +-- integer member was overwritten.
>>> +-- The IR was the following:
>>> +--
>>> +-- 0031 ------ LOOP ------------
>>> +-- 0032    u8  XLOAD  [0x100684521]  V
>>> +-- 0033    int BAND   0032  +12
>>> +-- 0034 >  int EQ     0033  +0
>>> +-- 0035 >  cdt CNEW   +96
>>> +-- 0036    p64 ADD    0035  +16
>>> +-- 0037    u32 XSTORE 0036  0029 <--- `u` member init
>>> +-- 0038    flt XSTORE 0036  0022 <--- `f` member init
>>> +-- 0039    u32 XLOAD  0036
>>> +-- 0040    num CONV   0039  num.u32
>>> +-- 0041    num CONV   0029  num.int
>>> +-- 0042 >  num EQ     0041  0040
>>> +-- 0043  + int ADD    0029  +1
>>> +-- 0044 >  int LE     0043  0001
>>> +-- 0045    int PHI    0029  0043
>>> +--
>>> +-- After the patch, the initialization is performed only
>>> +-- for the first member of the union, so now IR looks
>>> +-- like this:
>>> +-- 0029 ------ LOOP ------------
>>> +-- 0030    u8  XLOAD  [0x1047c4521]  V
>>> +-- 0031    int BAND   0030  +12
>>> +-- 0032 >  int EQ     0031  +0
>>> +-- 0033 }  cdt CNEW   +96
>>> +-- 0034    p64 ADD    0033  +16
>>> +-- 0035 }  u32 XSTORE 0034  0027 <--- `u` member init
>>> +-- 0036    u32 CONV   0027  u32.int
>>> +-- 0037    num CONV   0036  num.u32
>>> +-- 0038    num CONV   0027  num.int
>>> +-- 0039 >  num EQ     0038  0037
>>> +-- 0040  + int ADD    0027  +1
>>> +-- 0041 >  int LE     0040  0001
>>> +-- 0042    int PHI    0027  0040
>>> +
>>>  jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
>>>  for i = 1, NITERATIONS do
>>>    test:ok(union_type(i).u == i)
>>
>>Minor: the description of the test is still missing.
>Fixed! Here is the diff:
>==============================================
>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua
>index 65ba0f28..93cbf3af 100644
>--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua
>+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-128-fix-union-init.test.lua
>@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ local union_type = ffi.typeof('union { uint32_t u; float f; }')
> 
> jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
> for i = 1, NITERATIONS do
>-  test:ok(union_type(i).u == i)
>+  test:ok(union_type(i).u == i, 'first member init only')
> end
> 
> os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>==============================================
> 
>The branch is force-pushed.
>>> ==============================================
>>
>><snipped>
>>
>>> >>> +for i = 1, NITERATIONS do
>>> >>> + test:ok(union_type(i).u == i)
>>> >>testcases description is missed, please add one.
>>> >>> +end
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> +os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>>> > 
>>
>>--
>>Best regards,
>>Sergey Kaplun
>--
>Best regards,
>Maxim Kokryashkin