Hi!
The XXX ones are just some useful notes, the FIXME ones
are some issues with LuaJIT that remain unfixed in the mainline.
 
--
Best regards,
Maxim Kokryashkin
 
 
> 
>>Hi!
>>
>>Thanks for the patch!
>>
>>Number of FIXME and a XXX in the test - does it mean we’d have problems in CI?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Sergos
>> 
>>> On 8 Feb 2023, at 23:05, Maksim Kokryashkin < max.kokryashkin@gmail.com > wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>>>
>>> (cherry-picked from commit 03208c8162af9cc01ca76ee1676ca79e5abe9b60)
>>>
>>> `math.min()`/`math.max()` could produce different results.
>>> Previously, dirty values on the Lua stack could be
>>> treated as arguments to `math.min()`/`math.max()`.
>>> This patch adds check for the number of arguments provided to
>>> math.min/max, which fixes the issue.
>>>
>>> Also, several fold optimizations were modified or
>>> deleted due to inconsistencies between compiler
>>> and interpreter on NaN-values.
>>>
>>> Changes in `fold_kfold_numarith()` also required
>>> to replace the `CC_LO/CC_HI` comparison modes with the `CC_LE/CC_PL`
>>> on aarch64 platforms. The issue is thoroughly described just before
>>> the corresponding test.
>>>
>>> Changes for MIPS and PPC architectures are ommited, due to the
>>> absence of other patches the are dependent on.
>>>
>>> Maxim Kokryashkin & Sergey Kaplun:
>>> * added the description and tests for the problem
>>>
>>> Resolves tarantool/tarantool#6163
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v8:
>>> - Fixed comments as per review by Sergey
>>>
>>> Branch:  https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/gh-6163-min-max
>>> PR:  https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/7455
>>> Issue for x86 misbehavior:  https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/957
>>> src/lj_asm_arm.h | 6 +-
>>> src/lj_asm_arm64.h | 6 +-
>>> src/lj_opt_fold.c | 53 ++--
>>> src/lj_vmmath.c | 4 +-
>>> src/vm_arm.dasc | 4 +-
>>> src/vm_arm64.dasc | 4 +-
>>> src/vm_x64.dasc | 2 +-
>>> src/vm_x86.dasc | 2 +-
>>> test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua | 263 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 9 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/lj_asm_arm.h b/src/lj_asm_arm.h
>>> index 8af19eb9..6ae6e2f2 100644
>>> --- a/src/lj_asm_arm.h
>>> +++ b/src/lj_asm_arm.h
>>> @@ -1663,8 +1663,8 @@ static void asm_min_max(ASMState *as, IRIns *ir, int cc, int fcc)
>>> asm_intmin_max(as, ir, cc);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -#define asm_min(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_GT, CC_HI)
>>> -#define asm_max(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_LT, CC_LO)
>>> +#define asm_min(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_GT, CC_PL)
>>> +#define asm_max(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_LT, CC_LE)
>>>
>>> /* -- Comparisons --------------------------------------------------------- */
>>>
>>> @@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@ static void asm_hiop(ASMState *as, IRIns *ir)
>>> } else if ((ir-1)->o == IR_MIN || (ir-1)->o == IR_MAX) {
>>> as->curins--; /* Always skip the loword min/max. */
>>> if (uselo || usehi)
>>> - asm_sfpmin_max(as, ir-1, (ir-1)->o == IR_MIN ? CC_HI : CC_LO);
>>> + asm_sfpmin_max(as, ir-1, (ir-1)->o == IR_MIN ? CC_PL : CC_LE);
>>> return;
>>> #elif LJ_HASFFI
>>> } else if ((ir-1)->o == IR_CONV) {
>>> diff --git a/src/lj_asm_arm64.h b/src/lj_asm_arm64.h
>>> index 4aeb51f3..fe197700 100644
>>> --- a/src/lj_asm_arm64.h
>>> +++ b/src/lj_asm_arm64.h
>>> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static void asm_fpmin_max(ASMState *as, IRIns *ir, A64CC fcc)
>>> Reg dest = (ra_dest(as, ir, RSET_FPR) & 31);
>>> Reg right, left = ra_alloc2(as, ir, RSET_FPR);
>>> right = ((left >> 8) & 31); left &= 31;
>>> - emit_dnm(as, A64I_FCSELd | A64F_CC(fcc), dest, left, right);
>>> + emit_dnm(as, A64I_FCSELd | A64F_CC(fcc), dest, right, left);
>>> emit_nm(as, A64I_FCMPd, left, right);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1604,8 +1604,8 @@ static void asm_min_max(ASMState *as, IRIns *ir, A64CC cc, A64CC fcc)
>>> asm_intmin_max(as, ir, cc);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -#define asm_max(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_GT, CC_HI)
>>> -#define asm_min(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_LT, CC_LO)
>>> +#define asm_min(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_LT, CC_PL)
>>> +#define asm_max(as, ir) asm_min_max(as, ir, CC_GT, CC_LE)
>>>
>>> /* -- Comparisons --------------------------------------------------------- */
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/lj_opt_fold.c b/src/lj_opt_fold.c
>>> index 49f74996..27e489af 100644
>>> --- a/src/lj_opt_fold.c
>>> +++ b/src/lj_opt_fold.c
>>> @@ -1797,8 +1797,6 @@ LJFOLDF(reassoc_intarith_k64)
>>> #endif
>>> }
>>>
>>> -LJFOLD(MIN MIN any)
>>> -LJFOLD(MAX MAX any)
>>> LJFOLD(BAND BAND any)
>>> LJFOLD(BOR BOR any)
>>> LJFOLDF(reassoc_dup)
>>> @@ -1808,6 +1806,15 @@ LJFOLDF(reassoc_dup)
>>> return NEXTFOLD;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +LJFOLD(MIN MIN any)
>>> +LJFOLD(MAX MAX any)
>>> +LJFOLDF(reassoc_dup_minmax)
>>> +{
>>> + if (fins->op2 == fleft->op2)
>>> + return LEFTFOLD; /* (a o b) o b ==> a o b */
>>> + return NEXTFOLD;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> LJFOLD(BXOR BXOR any)
>>> LJFOLDF(reassoc_bxor)
>>> {
>>> @@ -1846,23 +1853,12 @@ LJFOLDF(reassoc_shift)
>>> return NEXTFOLD;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -LJFOLD(MIN MIN KNUM)
>>> -LJFOLD(MAX MAX KNUM)
>>> LJFOLD(MIN MIN KINT)
>>> LJFOLD(MAX MAX KINT)
>>> LJFOLDF(reassoc_minmax_k)
>>> {
>>> IRIns *irk = IR(fleft->op2);
>>> - if (irk->o == IR_KNUM) {
>>> - lua_Number a = ir_knum(irk)->n;
>>> - lua_Number y = lj_vm_foldarith(a, knumright, fins->o - IR_ADD);
>>> - if (a == y) /* (x o k1) o k2 ==> x o k1, if (k1 o k2) == k1. */
>>> - return LEFTFOLD;
>>> - PHIBARRIER(fleft);
>>> - fins->op1 = fleft->op1;
>>> - fins->op2 = (IRRef1)lj_ir_knum(J, y);
>>> - return RETRYFOLD; /* (x o k1) o k2 ==> x o (k1 o k2) */
>>> - } else if (irk->o == IR_KINT) {
>>> + if (irk->o == IR_KINT) {
>>> int32_t a = irk->i;
>>> int32_t y = kfold_intop(a, fright->i, fins->o);
>>> if (a == y) /* (x o k1) o k2 ==> x o k1, if (k1 o k2) == k1. */
>>> @@ -1875,24 +1871,6 @@ LJFOLDF(reassoc_minmax_k)
>>> return NEXTFOLD;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -LJFOLD(MIN MAX any)
>>> -LJFOLD(MAX MIN any)
>>> -LJFOLDF(reassoc_minmax_left)
>>> -{
>>> - if (fins->op2 == fleft->op1 || fins->op2 == fleft->op2)
>>> - return RIGHTFOLD; /* (b o1 a) o2 b ==> b; (a o1 b) o2 b ==> b */
>>> - return NEXTFOLD;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -LJFOLD(MIN any MAX)
>>> -LJFOLD(MAX any MIN)
>>> -LJFOLDF(reassoc_minmax_right)
>>> -{
>>> - if (fins->op1 == fright->op1 || fins->op1 == fright->op2)
>>> - return LEFTFOLD; /* a o2 (a o1 b) ==> a; a o2 (b o1 a) ==> a */
>>> - return NEXTFOLD;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /* -- Array bounds check elimination -------------------------------------- */
>>>
>>> /* Eliminate ABC across PHIs to handle t[i-1] forwarding case.
>>> @@ -2018,8 +1996,6 @@ LJFOLDF(comm_comp)
>>>
>>> LJFOLD(BAND any any)
>>> LJFOLD(BOR any any)
>>> -LJFOLD(MIN any any)
>>> -LJFOLD(MAX any any)
>>> LJFOLDF(comm_dup)
>>> {
>>> if (fins->op1 == fins->op2) /* x o x ==> x */
>>> @@ -2027,6 +2003,15 @@ LJFOLDF(comm_dup)
>>> return fold_comm_swap(J);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +LJFOLD(MIN any any)
>>> +LJFOLD(MAX any any)
>>> +LJFOLDF(comm_dup_minmax)
>>> +{
>>> + if (fins->op1 == fins->op2) /* x o x ==> x */
>>> + return LEFTFOLD;
>>> + return NEXTFOLD;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> LJFOLD(BXOR any any)
>>> LJFOLDF(comm_bxor)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/src/lj_vmmath.c b/src/lj_vmmath.c
>>> index c04459bd..ae4e0f15 100644
>>> --- a/src/lj_vmmath.c
>>> +++ b/src/lj_vmmath.c
>>> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ double lj_vm_foldarith(double x, double y, int op)
>>> case IR_ABS - IR_ADD: return fabs(x); break;
>>> #if LJ_HASJIT
>>> case IR_LDEXP - IR_ADD: return ldexp(x, (int)y); break;
>>> - case IR_MIN - IR_ADD: return x > y ? y : x; break;
>>> - case IR_MAX - IR_ADD: return x < y ? y : x; break;
>>> + case IR_MIN - IR_ADD: return x < y ? x : y; break;
>>> + case IR_MAX - IR_ADD: return x > y ? x : y; break;
>>> #endif
>>> default: return x;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/src/vm_arm.dasc b/src/vm_arm.dasc
>>> index a29292f1..89faa03e 100644
>>> --- a/src/vm_arm.dasc
>>> +++ b/src/vm_arm.dasc
>>> @@ -1718,8 +1718,8 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx)
>>> |.endif
>>> |.endmacro
>>> |
>>> - | math_minmax math_min, gt, hi
>>> - | math_minmax math_max, lt, lo
>>> + | math_minmax math_min, gt, pl
>>> + | math_minmax math_max, lt, le
>>> |
>>> |//-- String library -----------------------------------------------------
>>> |
>>> diff --git a/src/vm_arm64.dasc b/src/vm_arm64.dasc
>>> index f517a808..2c1bb4f8 100644
>>> --- a/src/vm_arm64.dasc
>>> +++ b/src/vm_arm64.dasc
>>> @@ -1494,8 +1494,8 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx)
>>> | b <6
>>> |.endmacro
>>> |
>>> - | math_minmax math_min, gt, hi
>>> - | math_minmax math_max, lt, lo
>>> + | math_minmax math_min, gt, pl
>>> + | math_minmax math_max, lt, le
>>> |
>>> |//-- String library -----------------------------------------------------
>>> |
>>> diff --git a/src/vm_x64.dasc b/src/vm_x64.dasc
>>> index 59f117ba..faeb5181 100644
>>> --- a/src/vm_x64.dasc
>>> +++ b/src/vm_x64.dasc
>>> @@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx)
>>> | jmp ->fff_res
>>> |
>>> |.macro math_minmax, name, cmovop, sseop
>>> - | .ffunc name
>>> + | .ffunc_1 name
>>> | mov RAd, 2
>>> |.if DUALNUM
>>> | mov RB, [BASE]
>>> diff --git a/src/vm_x86.dasc b/src/vm_x86.dasc
>>> index f7ffe5d2..1c995d16 100644
>>> --- a/src/vm_x86.dasc
>>> +++ b/src/vm_x86.dasc
>>> @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx)
>>> | xorps xmm4, xmm4; jmp <1 // Return +-Inf and +-0.
>>> |
>>> |.macro math_minmax, name, cmovop, sseop
>>> - | .ffunc name
>>> + | .ffunc_1 name
>>> | mov RA, 2
>>> | cmp dword [BASE+4], LJ_TISNUM
>>> |.if DUALNUM
>>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000..fb7a4058
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
>>> +local tap = require('tap')
>>> +local test = tap.test('gh-6163-jit-min-max')
>>> +local x86_64 = jit.arch == 'x86' or jit.arch == 'x64'
>>> +test:plan(18)
>>> +--
>>> +-- gh-6163: math.min/math.max inconsistencies.
>>> +--
>>> +
>>> +local function isnan(x)
>>> + return x ~= x
>>> +end
>>> +
>>> +local function array_is_consistent(res)
>>> + for i = 1, #res - 1 do
>>> + if res[i] ~= res[i + 1] and not (isnan(res[i]) and isnan(res[i + 1])) then
>>> + return false
>>> + end
>>> + end
>>> + return true
>>> +end
>>> +
>>> +-- This function creates dirty values on the Lua stack.
>>> +-- The latter of them is going to be treated as an
>>> +-- argument by the `math.min/math.max`.
>>> +-- The first two of them are going to be overwritten
>>> +-- by the math function itself.
>>> +local function filler()
>>> + return 1, 1, 1
>>> +end
>>> +
>>> +local min = math.min
>>> +local max = math.max
>>> +
>>> +-- It would be enough to test all cases for the
>>> +-- `math.min()` or for the `math.max()` only, because the
>>> +-- problem was in the common code. However, we shouldn't
>>> +-- make such assumptions in the testing code.
>>> +
>>> +-- `math.min()/math.max()` should raise an error when
>>> +-- called with no arguments.
>>> +filler()
>>> +local r, _ = pcall(function() min() end)
>>> +test:ok(not r, 'math.min fails with no args')
>>> +
>>> +filler()
>>> +r, _ = pcall(function() max() end)
>>> +test:ok(false == r, 'math.max fails with no args')
>>> +
>>> +local nan = 0/0
>>> +local x = 1
>>> +
>>> +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
>>> +
>>> +-- XXX: Looping over the operations and their arguments breakes the
>>> +-- semantics of some optimization tests below. The cases are
>>> +-- copy-pasted to preserve optimization semantics.
>>> +
>>> +-- Without the `(a o b) o a ==> a o b` fold optimization for
>>> +-- `math.min()/math.max()` the following mcode is emitted on aarch64
>>> +-- for the `math.min(math.min(x, nan), x)` expression:
>>> +--
>>> +-- | fcmp d2, d3 ; fcmp 1.0, nan
>>> +-- | fcsel d1, d2, d3, cc ; d1 == nan after this instruction
>>> +-- | ...
>>> +-- | fcmp d1, d2 ; fcmp nan, 1.0
>>> +-- | fcsel d0, d1, d2, cc ; d0 == 1.0 after this instruction
>>> +--
>>> +-- According to the `fcmp` docs[1], if either of the operands is NaN,
>>> +-- then the operands are unordered. It results in the following state
>>> +-- of the flags register: N=0, Z=0, C=1, V=1
>>> +--
>>> +-- According to the `fcsel` docs[2], if the condition is met, then
>>> +-- the first register value is taken, otherwise -- the second.
>>> +-- In our case, the condition is cc, which means that the `C` flag
>>> +-- should be clear[3], which is false. Then, the second value is taken,
>>> +-- which is `NaN` for the first `fcmp`-`fcsel` pair, and `1.0` for
>>> +-- the second.
>>> +--
>>> +-- If that fold optimization is applied, then only the first `fcmp`-`fcsel`
>>> +-- pair is emitted, and the result is `NaN`, which is inconsistent with
>>> +-- the result of the non-optimized mcode.
>>> +--
>>> +-- [1]:  https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0801/g/A64-Floating-point-Instructions/FCMP
>>> +-- [2]:  https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100069/0608/A64-Floating-point-Instructions/FCSEL
>>> +-- [3]:  https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0068/b/ARM-Instruction-Reference/Conditional-execution
>>> +
>>> +local result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(min(x, nan), x)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'math.min: reassoc_dup')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(max(x, nan), x)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'math.max: reassoc_dup')
>>> +
>>> +-- If one gets the expression like `math.min(x, math.min(x, nan))`,
>>> +-- and the `comm_dup` optimization is applied, it results in the
>>> +-- same situation as explained above. With the `comm_dup_minmax`
>>> +-- there is no swap, hence, everything is consistent again:
>>> +--
>>> +-- | fcmp d2, d3 ; fcmp 1.0, nan
>>> +-- | fcsel d1, d3, d2, pl ; d1 == nan after this instruction
>>> +-- | ...
>>> +-- | fcmp d2, d1 ; fcmp 1.0, nan
>>> +-- | fcsel d0, d1, d2, pl ; d0 == nan after this instruction
>>> +-- `pl` (aka `CC_PL`) condition means that N flag is 0 [2], that
>>> +-- is true when we are comparing something with NaN. So, the value of the
>>> +-- first source register is taken
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(x, min(x, nan))
>>> +end
>>> +-- FIXME: results are still inconsistent for the x86/64 architecture.
>>> +-- expected: nan nan nan nan
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result) or x86_64, 'math.min: comm_dup_minmax')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(x, max(x, nan))
>>> +end
>>> +-- FIXME: results are still inconsistent for the x86/64 architecture.
>>> +-- expected: nan nan nan nan
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result) or x86_64, 'math.max: comm_dup_minmax')
>>> +
>>> +-- The following optimization should be disabled:
>>> +-- (x o k1) o k2 ==> x o (k1 o k2)
>>> +
>>> +x = 1.2
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(min(x, 0/0), 1.3)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'math.min: reassoc_minmax_k')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(max(x, 0/0), 1.1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'math.max: reassoc_minmax_k')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(max(nan, 1), 1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'min-max-case1: reassoc_minmax_left')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(max(1, nan), 1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'min-max-case2: reassoc_minmax_left')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(min(nan, 1), 1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'max-min-case1: reassoc_minmax_left')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(min(1, nan), 1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'max-min-case2: reassoc_minmax_left')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(1, max(nan, 1))
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'min-max-case1: reassoc_minmax_right')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(1, max(1, nan))
>>> +end
>>> +-- FIXME: results are still inconsistent for the x86/64 architecture.
>>> +-- expected: nan nan nan nan
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result) or x86_64, 'min-max-case2: reassoc_minmax_right')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(1, min(nan, 1))
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1 1 1 1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'max-min-case1: reassoc_minmax_right')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(1, min(1, nan))
>>> +end
>>> +-- FIXME: results are still inconsistent for the x86/64 architecture.
>>> +-- expected: nan nan nan nan
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result) or x86_64, 'max-min-case2: reassoc_minmax_right')
>>> +
>>> +-- XXX: If we look into the disassembled code of `lj_vm_foldarith()`
>>> +-- we can see the following:
>>> +--
>>> +-- | /* In our test x == 7.1, y == nan */
>>> +-- | case IR_MIN - IR_ADD: return x > y ? y : x; break;
>>> +--
>>> +-- | ; case IR_MIN
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+337>: movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x18] ; xmm0 <- 7.1
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+343>: comisd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x10] ; comisd 7.1, nan
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+349>: jbe <lj_vm_foldarith+358> ; >= ?
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+351>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x10] ; return nan
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+356>: jmp <lj_vm_foldarith+398> ;
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+358>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x18] ; else return 7.1
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+363>: jmp <lj_vm_foldarith+398> ;
>>> +--
>>> +-- According to `comisd` documentation [4] in case when one of the operands
>>> +-- is NaN, the result is unordered and ZF,PF,CF := 111. This means that `jbe`
>>> +-- condition is true (CF=1 or ZF=1)[5], so we return 7.1 (the first
>>> +-- operand) for case `IR_MIN`.
>>> +--
>>> +-- However, in `lj_ff_math_min()` in the VM we see the following:
>>> +-- |7:
>>> +-- | sseop xmm0, xmm1
>>> +-- Where `sseop` is either `minsd` or `maxsd` instruction.
>>> +-- If only one of their args is a NaN, the second source operand,
>>> +-- either a NaN or a valid floating-point value, is
>>> +-- written to the result.
>>> +--
>>> +-- So the patch changes the `lj_vm_foldairth()` assembly in the following way:
>>> +-- | ; case IR_MIN
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+337>: movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x10] ; xmm0 <- nan
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+343>: comisd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x18] ; comisd nan, 7.1
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+349>: jbe <lj_vm_foldarith+358> ; >= ?
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+351>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x18] ; return 7.1
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+356>: jmp <lj_vm_foldarith+398> ;
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+358>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rsp+0x10] ; else return nan
>>> +-- | <lj_vm_foldarith+363>: jmp <lj_vm_foldarith+398> ;
>>> +--
>>> +-- So now we always return the second operand.
>>> +--
>>> +-- XXX: The two tests below use the `0/0` constant instead of `nan`
>>> +-- variable is dictated by the `fold_kfold_numarith` semantics.
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = min(min(7.1, 0/0), 1.1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'min: fold_kfold_numarith')
>>> +
>>> +result = {}
>>> +for k = 1, 4 do
>>> + result[k] = max(max(7.1, 0/0), 1.1)
>>> +end
>>> +-- expected: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
>>> +test:ok(array_is_consistent(result), 'max: fold_kfold_numarith')
>>> +
>>> +os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>>> --
>>> 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
>>>
>