Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ci: change runner dispatch for LuaJIT testing

[Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1150 bytes --]


Hi!
Thanks for the fixes!
LGTM
--
Best regards,
Maxim Kokryashkin
 
  
>Понедельник, 16 января 2023, 11:10 +03:00 от Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org>:
> 
>Sergey,
>
>Thanks for your review!
>
>On 13.01.23, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
>> Hi, Igor!
>>
>> Thanks for the patch!
>> LGTM, with a single question below.
>>
>> On 13.01.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, Igor!
>> > Thanks for the patch!
>> > LGTM, except for a few nits below.
>
>Added your tag:
>| Reviewed-by: Sergey Kaplun < skaplun@tarantool.org >
>
>> >  
>
><snipped>
>
>> > >>"regular" ones need to be chosen for full LuaJIT testing. At the same
>> > >>time there is no need to use "regular" runner for LuaJIT Static analysis
>> > >>workflow, hence 'lightweight' label is added to <runs-on> list in
>> > >>lint.yml workflow file.
>> > >Shall we create the same patch for the gnumake workflow?
>>
>> I agree here. IMHO, we can use "lightweight" label for gnumake build as
>> far as it tests only build, so doesn't require a lot of memory.
>
>Replied to the Max thread.
>
>>
>
><snipped>
>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Sergey Kaplun
>
>--
>Best regards,
>IM
 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1878 bytes --]