Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch! Please consider my comments below:   >from Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches : >  >From: Mike Pall > >Thanks to HybridDog. > >When build with optimization compiler may throw away overflow check in >`unpack()` base library function. Typo: s/build with optimization/built with optimization, Also,  I think we should mention the specific optimization that causes the mentioned behavior since it is not mentioned in both the LuaJIT’s issue and the original Lua issue. > >This patch prevents aforementioned error by comparing the unsigned >amount of values to unpack with `LUAI_MAXCSTACK` instead of 0. > >Sergey Kaplun: >* added the description and the test for the problem > >Part of tarantool/tarantool#7230 >--- > >Issue/PR: >* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/574 >* https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/7230 >Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-574-overflow-unpack-full-ci >PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/7596 > > src/lib_base.c | 6 ++++-- > test/tarantool-tests/lj-574-overflow-unpack.test.lua | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-574-overflow-unpack.test.lua > >diff --git a/src/lib_base.c b/src/lib_base.c >index 613a1859..cf57b4f2 100644 >--- a/src/lib_base.c >+++ b/src/lib_base.c >@@ -224,9 +224,11 @@ LJLIB_CF(unpack) >   int32_t n, i = lj_lib_optint(L, 2, 1); >   int32_t e = (L->base+3-1 < L->top && !tvisnil(L->base+3-1)) ? >  lj_lib_checkint(L, 3) : (int32_t)lj_tab_len(t); >+ uint32_t nu; >   if (i > e) return 0; >- n = e - i + 1; >- if (n <= 0 || !lua_checkstack(L, n)) >+ nu = (uint32_t)e - (uint32_t)i; >+ n = (int32_t)(nu+1); >+ if (nu >= LUAI_MAXCSTACK || !lua_checkstack(L, n)) >     lj_err_caller(L, LJ_ERR_UNPACK); >   do { >     cTValue *tv = lj_tab_getint(t, i); >diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-574-overflow-unpack.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-574-overflow-unpack.test.lua >new file mode 100644 >index 00000000..6715d947 >--- /dev/null >+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-574-overflow-unpack.test.lua >@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >+local tap = require('tap') >+ >+-- Test file to demonstrate integer overflow in the `unpack()` >+-- function due to compiler optimization. >+-- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/574 . >+local test = tap.test('lj-574-overflow-unpack') >+test:plan(1) >+ >+local r, e = pcall(unpack, {}, 0, 2^31 - 1) >+test:ok(not r and e == 'too many results to unpack', 'overflow check in unpack') >+ >+os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1) >-- >2.34.1 -- Best regards, Maxim Kokryashkin