>Пятница, 27 декабря 2019, 21:42 +03:00 от Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>:
>
>I've just noticed that we have '.' in the end of the commit
>title. I dropped it force pushed this commit, as an obvious
>fix.
>
>Also see some other changes below. They are pushed on top of
>this commit. Squash if you agree. Or change it, if I miss
>something.
Hi! Looks good, thanks. Squashed.
>
>
>================================================================================
>
>commit 77455d8aeb1f5f26920bbc6d213b9d32edcfd6bb
>Author: Vladislav Shpilevoy < v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org >
>Date:   Fri Dec 27 19:08:54 2019 +0300
>
>    Review fix 4/5
>
>diff --git a/src/box/vclock.h b/src/box/vclock.h
>index e1625410e..eb0fb5d8b 100644
>--- a/src/box/vclock.h
>+++ b/src/box/vclock.h
>@@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ enum { VCLOCK_ORDER_UNDEFINED = INT_MAX };
>  * \brief Compare vclocks
>  * \param a vclock
>  * \param b vclock
>- * \param ignore_zero Whether to order by 0-th component or not
>+ * \param ignore_zero Whether to order by 0-th component or not.
>+ *        The 0 component is ignored on anonymous replicas when
>+ *        they apply rows from remote master. Because anon
>+ *        replicas use the component for local purposes.
>  *
>  * \retval 1 if \a vclock is ordered after \a other
>  * \retval -1 if \a vclock is ordered before than \a other
>@@ -275,7 +278,7 @@ enum { VCLOCK_ORDER_UNDEFINED = INT_MAX };
>  */
> static inline int
> vclock_compare_generic(const struct vclock *a, const struct vclock *b,
>-	       bool ignore_zero)
>+		       bool ignore_zero)
> {
> 	bool le = true, ge = true;
> 	unsigned int map = a->map | b->map;
>@@ -283,11 +286,6 @@ vclock_compare_generic(const struct vclock *a, const struct vclock *b,
> 	bit_iterator_init(&it, &map, sizeof(map), true);
>
> 	size_t replica_id = bit_iterator_next(&it);
>-	/*
>-	 * Ignore 0-th component in comparisons.
>-	 * It is empty for normal replicas and should
>-	 * be ignored for anonymous ones.
>-	 */
> 	if (replica_id == 0 && ignore_zero)
> 		replica_id = bit_iterator_next(&it);
>


-- 
Sergey Petrenko