From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maksim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, skaplun@tarantool.org, m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Prevent compile of __concat with tailcall to fast function. Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:42:21 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0f961122-a8bd-4809-8fe5-d60e164a20bb@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231025114047.55743-1-max.kokryashkin@gmail.com> Hi, Max! Thanks for the patch! LGTM see my minor comments below On 10/25/23 14:40, Maksim Kokryashkin wrote: > From: Mike Pall <mike> <snipped> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-690-concat-tail-call.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-690-concat-tail-call.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..20775417 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-690-concat-tail-call.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > +local test = tap.test('lj-690-concat-tail-call'):skipcond({ > + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(), > +}) > + > +test:plan(1) > + > +-- XXX: Test execution results in an `unbalanced stack after > +-- hot instruction` assertion fail, only if the LuaJIT is built > +-- with assertion support. Otherwise, the behavior is undefined > +-- (it usually fails with a bus error instead). > + > +-- The 'setmetatable' tailcall is delayed, but the non-trivial > +-- MM_concat continuation is not delayed, and recording fails > +-- since there is no metatable with a defined concat for one of > +-- the arguments. During the continuation processing, the stack > +-- delta is altered and fixed up after the continuation frame > +-- recording. Since continuation frame recording fails, the > +-- stack delta is not restored, and the stack becomes unbalanced. > + > +local t = {} > +t.__concat = function () excess whitespace after "function" > + return setmetatable({}, t) > +end > +local a = setmetatable({}, t) > + > +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1') > +for _ = 1, 4 do > + -- XXX: Extra concat is needed for a non-trivial continuation. > + local _ = '' .. '' .. a > +end > + > +test:ok(true, 'stack is balanced') > +test:done(true) > -- > 2.39.3 (Apple Git-145) >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-08 16:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-25 11:40 Maksim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-10-25 13:10 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-08 16:42 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2023-11-23 6:29 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=0f961122-a8bd-4809-8fe5-d60e164a20bb@tarantool.org \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \ --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Prevent compile of __concat with tailcall to fast function.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox