From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tsafin@tarantool.org>
Received: from smtp29.i.mail.ru (smtp29.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.89])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631AE445320
 for <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>;
 Mon,  6 Jul 2020 16:33:49 +0300 (MSK)
From: "Timur Safin" <tsafin@tarantool.org>
References: <20200703144526.522358-1-gorcunov@gmail.com>
 <a8de4426-aafd-0dea-4f35-549650e9fd22@tarantool.org>
 <20200704073038.GK2256@grain> <0d0901d65311$f8c7a030$ea56e090$@tarantool.org>
 <20200705213722.GL2256@grain>
In-Reply-To: <20200705213722.GL2256@grain>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:33:46 +0300
Message-ID: <0ef401d6539a$13a1ad00$3ae50700$@tarantool.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: ru
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/22] Use void type in empty
	arguments list
List-Id: Tarantool development patches <tarantool-patches.dev.tarantool.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/options/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.tarantool.org/mailman/listinfo/tarantool-patches>, 
 <mailto:tarantool-patches-request@dev.tarantool.org?subject=subscribe>
To: 'Cyrill Gorcunov' <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: 'tml' <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, 'Vladislav Shpilevoy' <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>, 'Alexander Turenko' <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>

: From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
: Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/22] Use void type in empty
: arguments list
: 
...
: 
: IIRC we've been planning to switch to C eventually.

Please, not - the last time we discussed this question we have specifically 
asked to not waste time in this direction. And looks like we agreed on it.

In any case - plans or not is not relevant here, we are discussing current
C++ code which has slightly different guidelines to ANSI C. And this is 
a rare case which specifically described in C++ Core Guidelines. 

Timur