From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpng2.m.smailru.net (smtpng2.m.smailru.net [94.100.179.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C3174429E1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:35:03 +0300 (MSK) References: <1592733963.881996929@f405.i.mail.ru> From: Vladislav Shpilevoy Message-ID: <08e76fdf-eb70-c4f5-8dc7-ba339343b929@tarantool.org> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:35:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1592733963.881996929@f405.i.mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH small 1/1] test: don't use not aligned size for mempool List-Id: Tarantool development patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sergey Ostanevich Cc: tarantool-patches On 21/06/2020 12:06, Sergey Ostanevich wrote: > LGTM. > > I wonder how big is impact of all alignment activities? Can you consult with Mons to obtain a reference test? I am not sure I understand. What has Mons to do with that? Talking of impact - I suspect it is 0. With the only difference that formally we don't have unaligned access UB anymore. And that alongside some real bugs were fixed.