From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dev.tarantool.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64E04696C3 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:09:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id b24so1159242lfp.7 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:09:47 +0300 From: Konstantin Osipov Message-ID: <20200430130947.GC6499@atlas> References: <20200213142534.GA26443@tarantool.org> <36e21524-35d7-9f54-5953-32863df95709@tarantool.org> <20200430123500.GA6499@atlas> <8c71af0d-3693-82d5-4b15-f7b7fe38062c@tarantool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8c71af0d-3693-82d5-4b15-f7b7fe38062c@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-discussions] Implicit cast for ASSIGNMENT List-Id: Tarantool development process List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Imeev Mergen Cc: tarantool-discussions@dev.tarantool.org * Imeev Mergen [20/04/30 15:59]: > > The only possible exception is conversion of a lossless conversion > > of a numeric literal, e.g.: > > > > float_val = 1.1 -- implicitly convert decimal constant 1.1 to float > So, is it fine to implicitly cast 1.0(DOUBLE) to 1(INTEGER)? 1.0 is not double, it's DECIMAL. -- Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia https://scylladb.com