<HTML><BODY>Right. Sent fixed patch in reply.<br><br><br><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #0857A6; margin:10px; padding:0 0 0 10px;">
Вторник, 29 октября 2019, 20:02 +03:00 от Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>:<br>
<br>
<div id="">
<div class="js-helper js-readmsg-msg">
<style type="text/css"></style>
<div>
<div id="style_15723685420338298279_BODY">* Ilya Kosarev <<a href="mailto:i.kosarev@tarantool.org">i.kosarev@tarantool.org</a>> [19/10/29 19:59]:<br>
> join_vclock test could fail on huge load due to vclock advance<br>
> comparing to an actual WAL. In order to fix this we updated wal_sync so<br>
> that now we can obtain up to date vclock on the flushed state using it.<br>
> It is also better to get max index and index count in single request in<br>
> join_vclock test. With fixes mentioned above it is not fragile anymore.<br>
<br>
I suggest we copy vclock. it's not a good idea to make the two<br>
threads depend on each other on memory. the relay thread may be<br>
cancelled while the messasge is in the wal thread.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>-- <br>Ilya Kosarev<br></BODY></HTML>