[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Avoid out-of-range PC for stack overflow error from snapshot restore.
Sergey Kaplun
skaplun at tarantool.org
Tue Aug 19 20:11:15 MSK 2025
From: Mike Pall <mike>
Reported by Sergey Kaplun.
(cherry picked from commit e3fa3c48d8a4aadcf86429e9f7f6f1171914b15a)
In case when the saved PC in the snapshot is the first (0th index) PC in
the prototype like JFUNC*, the subtraction to determine the previous PC
in the `debug_framepc()` overflows and contains `NO_BCPOS` value. After
that, the pos is greater than sizebc. Hence, the code below may
interpret the bits in `pt->varinfo` like `bc_isret()` and assign an
invalid value to `pos` to be returned. Further, it may lead to the
assertion failure in the lj_debug_frameline().
This patch fixes it by pretending that this means the first non-header
bytecode in the prototype. Also, this patch removes the skipcond
introduced in the commit a74e5be07d54b4e98b85493de73317db520b3f71
("test: conditionally disable flaky lj-1196"). The new test isn't added
since the assertion failure depends on the specific memory address of
the `varinfo`, so it is too hard to create a stable reproducer.
Sergey Kaplun:
* added the description for the problem
Part of tarantool/tarantool#11691
---
Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1369-stackov-invalid-bc
Related issues:
* https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/11691
* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1369
* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1359
* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1196
src/lj_debug.c | 1 +
.../lj-1196-partial-snap-restore.test.lua | 10 +---------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lj_debug.c b/src/lj_debug.c
index 76e48aca..bc057cf6 100644
--- a/src/lj_debug.c
+++ b/src/lj_debug.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static BCPos debug_framepc(lua_State *L, GCfunc *fn, cTValue *nextframe)
pt = funcproto(fn);
pos = proto_bcpos(pt, ins) - 1;
#if LJ_HASJIT
+ if (pos == NO_BCPOS) return 1; /* Pretend it's the first bytecode. */
if (pos > pt->sizebc) { /* Undo the effects of lj_trace_exit for JLOOP. */
if (bc_isret(bc_op(ins[-1]))) {
GCtrace *T = (GCtrace *)((char *)(ins-1) - offsetof(GCtrace, startins));
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1196-partial-snap-restore.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1196-partial-snap-restore.test.lua
index 5199ca00..a74f97bd 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1196-partial-snap-restore.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1196-partial-snap-restore.test.lua
@@ -4,15 +4,7 @@ local tap = require('tap')
-- in case of the stack overflow.
-- See also: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1196.
-local test = tap.test('lj-1196-partial-snap-restore'):skipcond({
- -- Disable test for Tarantool to avoid failures, see also:
- -- https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1369.
- ['Disabled for Tarantool due to lj-1369'] = _TARANTOOL,
- -- Also, it may fail on some non-arm64 runners stable after
- -- adding the skip condition above.
- ['Disabled for x86/x64 due to lj-1369'] = jit.arch ~= 'arm64',
-})
-
+local test = tap.test('lj-1196-partial-snap-restore')
test:plan(1)
-- XXX: The reproducer below uses several stack slot offsets to
--
2.50.1
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list