[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] Fix embedded bytecode loader.
Sergey Kaplun
skaplun at tarantool.org
Sun Aug 6 14:09:27 MSK 2023
Hi, Max, Sergey!
The patch is LGTM, after adding the test case (without additional CI
job, if you don't want), see rational below.
On 31.07.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
<snipped>
> > tests patch partially.
> Typo: s/tests the patch/
>
> Well, I've tried to run that test on x32 machine, and nothing happened.
> I think we should backport this patch without tests then, since this
> test seems irrelevant to the problem. What do you think?
>
> Also, it is kinda strange, that you are talking about a test in a patch
> without any tests. You need to either mention that the test is present in
> the next commit, or move that test here.
The problem is perfectly repoduced for me if use instructions from [1].
I suppose that we should add this test, because it:
1) Shows the problem for the actual build that can be done by the user.
2) Still tests LuaJIT loader.
> >
> > Sergey Bronnikov:
> > * added the description
> > ---
> > src/lj_bcread.c | 10 +++++-----
> > src/lj_lex.c | 6 ++++++
> > src/lj_lex.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
<snipped>
> > --
> > 2.34.1
[1]: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/549
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list