[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v7] memprof: introduce cli flag to run dump parser
Igor Munkin
imun at tarantool.org
Wed Aug 2 11:12:50 MSK 2023
Max,
On 02.08.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> Hi, Igor!
>
> Well, I see no obstacles with flag handling in Tarantool.
> For instance, the -j flag proxy can do exactly what you want.
>
> | review/tarantool/build fckxorg/gh-5688-cli-for-memprof-parse ✔ 239d16h
> | ▶ ./src/tarantool -j on -e 'print(jit.status())'
> | true fold cse dce fwd dse narrow loop abc sink fuse
> |
> | review/tarantool/build fckxorg/gh-5688-cli-for-memprof-parse ✔ 239d16h
> | ▶ ./src/tarantool -j off -e 'print(jit.status())'
> | false fold cse dce fwd dse narrow loop abc sink fuse
>
My bad, I'm concerted rather about this difference and its effect in
Tarantool flags processing:
| $ ./luajit -bl -e 'print("qq")'
| -- BYTECODE -- "print("qq")":0-1
| 0001 GGET 0 0 ; "print"
| 0002 KSTR 1 1 ; "qq"
| 0003 CALL 0 1 2
| 0004 RET0 0 1
|
| $ cd ../src/tools
| $ ../src/luajit -tm -e 'print("qq")'
| luajit-parse-memprof.lua: ERROR: unrecognized option `-e'. Try `--help'.
|
In other words, I wonder
* whether flags in Tarantool are position independent (i.e. the result
of -j + -e combination equals to -e + -j);
* how --leak-only will be handled in this case.
BTW, I have a thought regarding introducing kinda "mode" for memprof, so
we can use it like -tm=leak-only (as an alternative to the original
proposal in the first message).
Besides, I see no tests for --leak-only (have no idea, why everyone
missed this on review). Could you add them?
> Tarantool's flag handling is not pleasant to say the least,
> but we should try to do the same as with -j.
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Kokryashkin
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:23:03AM +0000, Igor Munkin wrote:
> > Max,
> >
> > We've discussed with Sergey K. how to run -tm with --leak-only today.
> > Fortunately, it works fine in LuaJIT, however, I'm afraid such flag
> > handling in incompatible in Tarantool. Hence, I suggest to glue this
> > flag with comma to -tm, like jdump does[1]. Thoughts?
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/tarantool/master/src/jit/dump.lua#L18
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > IM
--
Best regards,
IM
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list