[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/8] test: introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR variable
sergeyb at tarantool.org
Fri Sep 2 15:06:43 MSK 2022
On 31.08.2022 17:53, Igor Munkin wrote:
> Thanks for your review!
> On 15.08.22, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
>> thanks for the patch. See my comments inline.
>> On 11.08.2022 14:17, Igor Munkin wrote:
>>> Before the patch both memprof and sysprof artefacts are generated within
>>> the binary artefacts tree (i.e. in the same directory LuaJIT binary is
>>> generated). However, more convenient way is producing these temporary
>>> profiles in a separate directory (e.g. located on the partition with
>>> more strict space limits). As a result of the patch all memprof and
>>> sysprof test chunks consider LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR environment variable to
>>> set the directory where test profiles are generated. For the case when
>>> LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR is not set, everything works as before.
>> Commit message is inconsistent a bit with a patch itself.
>> As far as I understand many hunks are not related to introducing
>> Probably it is better to change commit one-line message from "test:
>> introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR variable"
>> to something like "test: refactoring and introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR
>> variable". It allows to keep patch
>> as is and change expectations for those who will look at your patch.
> I believe your commit subject is too long, so I propose another
> solution. Since the only thing affected by LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR is
> <utils.profilename>, so I can write something like "test: introduce
> utils.profilename helper" and describe its rationale and functions
> within the commit message. Are you OK with it?
More information about the Tarantool-patches