[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2] test: adapt test checking reversed function

[Sergey Kaplun]

Hi, Maxim!

Thanks for the fixes!

LGTM.

On 01.03.22, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:

<snipped>

> diff --git a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/pm.lua b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/pm.lua
> index e364ff9d..61f437f6 100644
> --- a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/pm.lua
> +++ b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/pm.lua
> @@ -206,12 +206,16 @@ function rev (s)
>    return string.gsub(s, "(.)(.+)", function (c,s1) return rev(s1)..c end)
>  end
>  
> -local x = string.rep('012345', 10)
> --- FIXME: The first Tarantool's fiber has only 512Kb of stack.
> --- It is not enough for this recursive call.
> +-- The first fiber in Tarantool has only 512Kb of the stack,
> +-- which is not enough to handle such a deep call chain. Thus,
> +-- the chunk of code being considered cores with SIGSEGV as a
> +-- result of C stack overflow.
> +--
> +-- This test is adapted to match the stack size of the first fiber in
> +-- Tarantool by decreasing the string length.
>  -- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5782.
> --- The test is disabled for Tarantool binary.
> --- assert(rev(rev(x)) == x)

Minor: Please, add the comment, that the following example crashes both
Tarantool and LuaJIT (so the problem with C stack overflow still
exists):

| luajit -e '
| local function rev (s)
|   return string.gsub(s, "(.)(.+)", function (c,s1)
|     return rev(s1)..c
|   end)
| end
| local x = string.rep("0", 1000)
| rev(x)
| '

> +local x = string.rep('01234', 10)
> +assert(rev(rev(x)) == x)
>  
>  
>  -- gsub with tables
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun