[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 16/21] sql: refactor REPLACE() function

[Mergen Imeev]

Thank you for the review! My answer and diff below.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:45:29AM +0200, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Thanks for the patch!
> 
> On 08.10.2021 19:32, Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> > Part of #4145
> > ---
> >  src/box/sql/func.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/box/sql/func.c b/src/box/sql/func.c
> > index a3ca53545..f26d101e9 100644
> > --- a/src/box/sql/func.c
> > +++ b/src/box/sql/func.c
> > @@ -1460,34 +1460,26 @@ replaceFunc(struct sql_context *context, int argc, struct Mem *argv)
> >  	int i, j;		/* Loop counters */
> >  
> >  	assert(argc == 3);
> > -	UNUSED_PARAMETER(argc);
> > -	zStr = mem_as_ustr(&argv[0]);
> > -	if (zStr == 0)
> > -		return;
> > -	nStr = mem_len_unsafe(&argv[0]);
> > -	assert(zStr == mem_as_ustr(&argv[0]));	/* No encoding change */
> > -	zPattern = mem_as_ustr(&argv[1]);
> > -	if (zPattern == 0) {
> > -		assert(mem_is_null(&argv[1])
> > -		       || sql_context_db_handle(context)->mallocFailed);
> > +	(void)argc;
> > +	if (mem_is_any_null(&argv[0], &argv[1]) || mem_is_null(&argv[2]))
> >  		return;
> > -	}
> > -	nPattern = mem_len_unsafe(&argv[1]);
> > +	assert(mem_is_bytes);
> 
> 1. You forgot to call the function.
> 
Thanks, fixed.

> > +	zStr = (const unsigned char *)argv[0].z;
> > +	nStr = argv[0].n;
> > +	zPattern = (const unsigned char *)argv[1].z;
> > +	nPattern = argv[1].n;
> >  	if (nPattern == 0) {
> > -		assert(!mem_is_null(&argv[1]));
> > -		sql_result_value(context, &argv[0]);
> > +		if (mem_copy(context->pOut, &argv[0]) != 0)
> > +			context->is_aborted = true;
> >  		return;
> > @@ -1497,22 +1489,12 @@ replaceFunc(struct sql_context *context, int argc, struct Mem *argv)
> >  			zOut[j++] = zStr[i];
> >  		} else {
> >  			u8 *zOld;
> > -			sql *db = sql_context_db_handle(context);
> >  			nOut += nRep - nPattern;
> > -			testcase(nOut - 1 == db->aLimit[SQL_LIMIT_LENGTH]);
> > -			testcase(nOut - 2 == db->aLimit[SQL_LIMIT_LENGTH]);
> > -			if (nOut - 1 > db->aLimit[SQL_LIMIT_LENGTH]) {
> 
> 2. Why did you drop length limit assertions and checks?
> 
These assertions do nothing, since testcase macro defined this way:
#define testcase(X)

I don't think we should check the length of the STRING and VARBINARY values in
functions, since the result is checked in the VDBE.

> > -				diag_set(ClientError, ER_SQL_EXECUTE, "string "\
> > -					 "or binary string is too big");
> > -				context->is_aborted = true;
> > -				sql_free(zOut);
> > -				return;
> > -			}

Diff:

diff --git a/src/box/sql/func.c b/src/box/sql/func.c
index 91ff741df..f7024a9b9 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/func.c
+++ b/src/box/sql/func.c
@@ -1485,7 +1485,8 @@ replaceFunc(struct sql_context *context, int argc, struct Mem *argv)
 	(void)argc;
 	if (mem_is_any_null(&argv[0], &argv[1]) || mem_is_null(&argv[2]))
 		return;
-	assert(mem_is_bytes);
+	assert(mem_is_bytes(&argv[0]) && mem_is_bytes(&argv[1]) &&
+	       mem_is_bytes(&argv[2]));
 	zStr = (const unsigned char *)argv[0].z;
 	nStr = argv[0].n;
 	zPattern = (const unsigned char *)argv[1].z;