[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/3] test: add PUC-Rio Lua 5.1 test suite

[Sergey Kaplun]

Sergos, Igor,

Thanks for the review!

On 17.03.21, Igor Munkin wrote:
> Sergos,
> 
> Thanks for you review!
> 
> On 16.03.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > On 12 Mar 2021, at 08:36, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun at tarantool.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > This patch adds PUC-Rio Lua 5.1 test suite as a part of the LuaJIT
> > > test suite. Source code taken verbatim from
> > > https://www.lua.org/tests/lua5.1-tests.tar.gz.
> > > 
> > > <lib1.c> and <lib2.c> is slightly modified to be consistent with the
> > > current LuaJIT's LuaC API.
> > > 
> > 
> > This should be a different commit, isn’t it?
> 
> Yes, it does.

Moved into sparate commit, see here [1].

> 
> > 
> > > Some tests may fail after this commit. They will be disabled
> > > or adapted in the next patches.
> > 
> > The fact patch causes - even temporarily - some fails is no good. The
> > only exception is initial commit, that brings original test suite.
> > Can you please make a consistent change that will left the tests disabled
> > until they adapted and enabled back?
> 
> I believe such juggling with enabling/disabling is quite unprofitable.
> We iteratively fix broken tests within the series making CI green as a
> result. Even if lib[12].c fails to compile -- it is not a problem, since

I've moved compilation rules for this libraries in the separate commit.
See patch here [1].

> these libraries are test dependencies, not build ones. Sergey can simply
> mention the fact the build of suite-related tests is broken, so one can
> find the comment in commit message while e.g. bisecting the bug.
> Otherwise, the patches are spoiled with unnecessary changes.
> 
> > 
> > regards,
> > Sergos
> > 
> > > 
> 
> <snipped>
> 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.28.0
> > > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> IM

[1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/2021-March/022788.html

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun