[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/3] test: corrected reported error lines
Timur Safin
tsafin at tarantool.org
Mon Jun 28 02:16:14 MSK 2021
: From: Igor Munkin <imun at tarantool.org>
: Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/3] test: corrected reported
: error lines
:
: Timur,
:
: Thanks for the patch! Though the change is quite trivial, the patch is
: not OK right from the top. Please adjust the commit subject according to
: our contribution guidelines[1].
Much thanks Sasha for his useful proposal, not thanks to Igor for useless
referring to guidelines without suggestion.
...
: You can argue that this is a trivial oneliner and I am making lot of ado
: about nothing,
Exactly.
...
:
: However, there are several nits to be resolved,
: so please move this patch out from this series in a separate one.
Will do
:
: On 11.06.21, Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches wrote:
: > It always was a problem that reported source line was not
: > pointing to the actual callee line number, but rather to
:
: Don't get why you are talking about callee here: regardless the line to
: be reported (the current one or the one where the function is defined),
: it is a *caller* for the <traceback> function.
Yes, that was caller source line I was referring to. Thanks for correction.
:
: So, the actual problem you're writing is that the line with function
: signature is used instead of the line where the function execution is
: stopped at the moment of the <traceback> call.
:
: As for me, these are the different reasons.
:
: > the start of file, i.e. we have seen:
: > ```
: > [001] sql-tap/tkt-9a8b09f8e6.test.lua memtx
: > [001] not ok 22 - 4.3 #
: > [001] Traceback:
: > [001] [Lua ] function 'do_catchsql_test' at
: </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/var/001_sql-tap/sqltester.lua:123>
: > [001] [main] at </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/sql-tap/tkt-
: 9a8b09f8e6.test.lua:0>
: > [001]
: > [001] not ok 23 - 4.4 #
: > [001] Traceback:
: > [001] [Lua ] function 'do_catchsql_test' at
: </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/var/001_sql-tap/sqltester.lua:123>
: > [001] [main] at </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/sql-tap/tkt-
: 9a8b09f8e6.test.lua:0>
: > ```
: > (see the :0 part)
:
: Minor: Strictly saying :123 part is also broken.
O_o, why? Could you please clarify? We report it as line number in the
source file, in this case tkt-9a8b09f8e6.test.lua:123 was exactly the
caller location?
: The only difference
: between them is that :0 line is used for so called "main" function.
:
: > Instead of correct line numbers:
: > ```
: > [001] sql-tap/tkt-9a8b09f8e6.test.lua memtx
: > [001] not ok 22 - 4.3 #
: > [001] Traceback:
: > [001] [Lua ] function 'do_catchsql_test' at
: </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/var/001_sql-tap/sqltester.lua:142>
: > [001] [main] at </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/sql-tap/tkt-
: 9a8b09f8e6.test.lua:242>
: > [001]
: > [001] not ok 23 - 4.4 #
: > [001] Traceback:
: > [001] [Lua ] function 'do_catchsql_test' at
: </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/var/001_sql-tap/sqltester.lua:142>
: > [001] [main] at </home/tsafin/tarantool/test/sql-tap/tkt-
: 9a8b09f8e6.test.lua:252>
: > ```
: >
: > The problem was due to `.linedefined` used, instead of source line in
: `.currentline`.
:
: Typo: The line exceeds 72 chars.
Ok.
:
: >
: > Closes #6134
: > ---
: > src/lua/tap.lua | 2 +-
: > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
: >
: > diff --git a/src/lua/tap.lua b/src/lua/tap.lua
: > index 346724d84..77fd8d096 100644
: > --- a/src/lua/tap.lua
: > +++ b/src/lua/tap.lua
: > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ local function traceback(level)
: > local frame = {
: > source = info.source;
: > src = info.short_src;
: > - line = info.linedefined or 0;
: > + line = info.currentline or info.linedefined or 0;
:
: Why did you leave such a complex code here? I believe you can use just
: info.currentline here.
Just in case :), if currentline may be missing in the traceback object
for any reason. If it's impossible for the set of requested flags, then
I'll get rid of linedefined here.
:
: [1]:
: https://www.tarantool.io/en/doc/latest/dev_guide/developer_guidelines/#how-
: to-write-a-commit-message
:
: --
: Best regards,
: IM
Thanks,
Timur
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list