[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 1/8] build: add Christian Hansen c-dt to the build
Vladimir Davydov
vdavydov at tarantool.org
Tue Aug 17 18:50:19 MSK 2021
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 02:59:35AM +0300, Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> * Integrated chansen/c-dt parser as 3rd party module to the
> Tarantool cmake build process;
> * Points to tarantool/c-dt instead of original chansen/c-dt to
> have easier build integration, because there are additional
> commits which have integrated cmake support and have established
> symbols renaming facilities (similar to those we see in xxhash
> or icu).
> We have to be able to rename externally public symbols to avoid
> name clashes with 3rd party modules. We prefix c-dt symbols
> in the Tarantool build with `tnt_` prefix;
I don't see this done in this patch. Looks like this is done by patch 2.
> * took special care that generated build artifacts not override
> in-source files, but use different build/ directory.
>
> * added datetime parsing unit tests, for literals - with and
> without trailing timezones;
> * also we check that strftime is reversible and produce consistent
> results after roundtrip from/to strings;
> * discovered the harder way that on *BSD/MacOSX `strftime()` format
> `%z` outputs local time-zone if passed `tm_gmtoff` is 0.
> This behaviour is different to that we observed on Linux, thus we
> might have different execution results. Made test to not use `%z`
> and only operate with normalized date time formats `%F` and `%T`
>
> Part of #5941
> ---
> .gitmodules | 3 +
> CMakeLists.txt | 8 +
> cmake/BuildCDT.cmake | 8 +
> src/CMakeLists.txt | 3 +-
> test/unit/CMakeLists.txt | 3 +-
> test/unit/datetime.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> test/unit/datetime.result | 358 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> third_party/c-dt | 1 +
> 8 files changed, 605 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 cmake/BuildCDT.cmake
> create mode 100644 test/unit/datetime.c
> create mode 100644 test/unit/datetime.result
> create mode 160000 third_party/c-dt
>
> diff --git a/test/unit/datetime.c b/test/unit/datetime.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..64c19dac4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/unit/datetime.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
> +#include "dt.h"
> +#include <assert.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <time.h>
> +
> +#include "unit.h"
> +
> +static const char sample[] = "2012-12-24T15:30Z";
> +
> +#define S(s) {s, sizeof(s) - 1}
> +struct {
> + const char * sz;
Extra space after '*'.
We usually name a variable that stores a zero-terminated 's' or 'str',
never 'sz'.
> +#define DIM(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof(a[0]))
There's 'lengthof' helper already defined for this.
> +
> +/* p5-time-moment/src/moment_parse.c: parse_string_lenient() */
I don't understand the purpose of this comment.
> +static int
> +parse_datetime(const char *str, size_t len, int64_t *sp, int32_t *np,
> + int32_t *op)
What's 'sp', 'np', and 'op'? Please refrain from using confusing
abbreviations.
> +{
> + size_t n;
> + dt_t dt;
> + char c;
> + int sod = 0, nanosecond = 0, offset = 0;
> +
> + n = dt_parse_iso_date(str, len, &dt);
> + if (!n)
> + return 1;
> + if (n == len)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + c = str[n++];
> + if (!(c == 'T' || c == 't' || c == ' '))
> + return 1;
> +
> + str += n;
> + len -= n;
> +
> + n = dt_parse_iso_time(str, len, &sod, &nanosecond);
> + if (!n)
> + return 1;
> + if (n == len)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + if (str[n] == ' ')
> + n++;
Bad indentation.
> +
> + str += n;
> + len -= n;
> +
> + n = dt_parse_iso_zone_lenient(str, len, &offset);
> + if (!n || n != len)
> + return 1;
> +
> +exit:
> + *sp = ((int64_t)dt_rdn(dt) - 719163) * 86400 + sod - offset * 60;
Please define and use appropriate constants to make the code easier for
understanding: DAYS_PER_YEAR, MINUTES_PER_HOUR, etc.
> + *np = nanosecond;
> + *op = offset;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* avoid introducing external datetime.h dependency -
> + just copy paste it for today
> +*/
Bad comment formatting.
> +#define SECS_PER_DAY 86400
> +#define DT_EPOCH_1970_OFFSET 719163
> +
> +struct datetime {
> + double secs;
> + int32_t nsec;
> + int32_t offset;
> +};
I see that this struct as well as some functions in this module are
defined in src/lib/core/datetime in patch 2, and then you remove struct
datetime from this test in patch 3, but leave the helper functions
datetime_to_tm, parse_datetime.
This makes me think that:
- You should squash patches 1-3.
- Both datetime and datetime manipulating functions (including
parse_datetime) should be defined only in src/lib/core/datetime
while test/unit should depend on src/lib/core/datetime.
> +
> +static int
> +local_rd(const struct datetime *dt)
> +{
> + return (int)((int64_t)dt->secs / SECS_PER_DAY) + DT_EPOCH_1970_OFFSET;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +local_dt(const struct datetime *dt)
> +{
> + return dt_from_rdn(local_rd(dt));
> +}
> +
> +struct tm *
> +datetime_to_tm(struct datetime *dt)
> +{
> + static struct tm tm;
> +
> + memset(&tm, 0, sizeof(tm));
> + dt_to_struct_tm(local_dt(dt), &tm);
> +
> + int seconds_of_day = (int64_t)dt->secs % 86400;
> + tm.tm_hour = (seconds_of_day / 3600) % 24;
> + tm.tm_min = (seconds_of_day / 60) % 60;
> + tm.tm_sec = seconds_of_day % 60;
> +
> + return &tm;
> +}
> +
> +static void datetime_test(void)
> +{
> + size_t index;
> + int64_t secs_expected;
> + int32_t nanosecs;
> + int32_t ofs;
offset?
> +
> + plan(355);
> + parse_datetime(sample, sizeof(sample) - 1,
> + &secs_expected, &nanosecs, &ofs);
> +
> + for (index = 0; index < DIM(tests); index++) {
> + int64_t secs;
> + int rc = parse_datetime(tests[index].sz, tests[index].len,
> + &secs, &nanosecs, &ofs);
> + is(rc, 0, "correct parse_datetime return value for '%s'",
> + tests[index].sz);
> + is(secs, secs_expected, "correct parse_datetime output "
> + "seconds for '%s", tests[index].sz);
> +
> + /* check that stringized literal produces the same date */
> + /* time fields */
> + static char buff[40];
> + struct datetime dt = {secs, nanosecs, ofs};
> + /* datetime_to_tm returns time in GMT zone */
> + struct tm * p_tm = datetime_to_tm(&dt);
Extra space after '*'.
> + size_t len = strftime(buff, sizeof buff, "%F %T", p_tm);
> + ok(len > 0, "strftime");
> + int64_t parsed_secs;
> + int32_t parsed_nsecs, parsed_ofs;
> + rc = parse_datetime(buff, len, &parsed_secs, &parsed_nsecs, &parsed_ofs);
> + is(rc, 0, "correct parse_datetime return value for '%s'", buff);
> + is(secs, parsed_secs,
> + "reversible seconds via strftime for '%s", buff);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main(void)
> +{
> + plan(1);
> + datetime_test();
> +
> + return check_plan();
> +}
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list