[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 07/12] box: introduce `box.ctl.demote`
Vladislav Shpilevoy
v.shpilevoy at tarantool.org
Wed Aug 4 02:25:58 MSK 2021
Thanks for the fixes!
See 3 comments below.
> diff --git a/src/box/iproto.cc b/src/box/iproto.cc
> index 3ed641eea..5cc69b77f 100644
> --- a/src/box/iproto.cc
> +++ b/src/box/iproto.cc
> @@ -557,6 +558,20 @@ struct iproto_connection
> struct iproto_thread *iproto_thread;
> };
>
> +#ifdef NDEBUG
> +#define iproto_write_error(fd, e, schema_version, sync) \
> + iproto_do_write_error(fd, e, schema_version, sync);
> +#else
> +#define iproto_write_error(fd, e, schema_version, sync) do { \
> + int flags = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL, 0); \
> + if (flags >= 0) \
> + fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, flags & (~O_NONBLOCK)); \
> + iproto_do_write_error(fd, e, schema_version, sync); \
> + if (flags >= 0) \
> + fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, flags); \
> +} while (0);
> +#endif
1. Why didn't you do this right in iproto_write_error? Why do
you need to change iproto.cc code at all?
> diff --git a/src/box/relay.cc b/src/box/relay.cc
> index 805b5e7ff..2947468ba 100644
> --- a/src/box/relay.cc
> +++ b/src/box/relay.cc
> @@ -444,20 +444,20 @@ relay_initial_join(int fd, uint64_t sync, struct vclock *vclock,
> */
> if (replica_version_id > 0) {
> /* Mark the beginning of the metadata stream. */
> - row.type = IPROTO_JOIN_META;
> - coio_write_xrow(&relay->io, &row);
> + xrow_encode_type(&row, IPROTO_JOIN_META);
> + xstream_write(&relay->stream, &row);
2. Why do you use xtream_write? And why coio_write_xrow just a few lines
above works just fine then?
> xrow_encode_raft(&row, &fiber()->gc, &raft_req);
> - coio_write_xrow(&relay->io, &row);
> + xstream_write(&relay->stream, &row);
>
> char body[XROW_SYNCHRO_BODY_LEN_MAX];
> xrow_encode_synchro(&row, body, &req);
> row.replica_id = req.replica_id;
> - coio_write_xrow(&relay->io, &row);
> + xstream_write(&relay->stream, &row);
>
> /* Mark the end of the metadata stream. */
> - row.type = IPROTO_JOIN_SNAPSHOT;
> - coio_write_xrow(&relay->io, &row);
> + xrow_encode_type(&row, IPROTO_JOIN_SNAPSHOT);
> + xstream_write(&relay->stream, &row);
> }
> diff --git a/src/box/raft.c b/src/box/raft.c
> index f8d13aa32..bc69f7f1b 100644
> --- a/src/box/raft.c
> +++ b/src/box/raft.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,24 @@ box_raft_request_to_msg(const struct raft_request *req, struct raft_msg *msg)
> };
> }
>
> +static void
> +box_raft_update_synchro_queue(struct raft *raft)
> +{
> + assert(raft == box_raft());
> + if (raft->state != RAFT_STATE_LEADER)
> + return;
> + int rc = 0;
> + uint32_t errcode = 0;
> + do {
> + rc = box_promote_qsync();
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + struct error *err = diag_last_error(diag_get());
> + errcode = box_error_code(err);
> + diag_log();
> + }
3. Could it stop being a leader during the retries? Would it
make sense to continue them then?
> + } while (rc != 0 && errcode == ER_QUORUM_WAIT && !fiber_is_cancelled());
> +}
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list