[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/3] test: make utils.selfrun usage easier
Sergey Ostanevich
sergos at tarantool.org
Wed Apr 7 15:16:33 MSK 2021
Great, thanks for explanation and comments update!
Sergos
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 21:32, Igor Munkin <imun at tarantool.org> wrote:
>
> Sergos,
>
> Thanks for your review!
>
> On 06.04.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> LGTM with some ignorable nits below.
>
> Added your tag:
> | Reviewed-by: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos at tarantool.org <mailto:sergos at tarantool.org>>
>
>>
>> Sergos
>>
>>
>>> On 5 Apr 2021, at 20:11, Igor Munkin <imun at tarantool.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Previous implementation of <utils.selfrun> implicitly obliges the
>>> developer to pass the arguments to the test script for the second run.
>>> This has been unnoticed, since the existing tests are invoked for two
>>> different cases, so the script arguments were kinda obligatory, but they
>>> are not required in a general case.
>>>
>>> As a result the function signals the testing system that the script is
>>> being run the second time via TEST_SELFRUN environment variable.
>>>
>>
>> To me it looks like it was an infinite recursion, that was interrupted
>> only by chance in case a test does not tolerate the reentrance.
>
> Precisely. Honestly, it was a "soft" requirement for such tests (as I
> have written above), but considering your attempts with implementing
> tests for JIT machinery, I've finally realized this problem.
>
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Munkin <imun at tarantool.org <mailto:imun at tarantool.org>>
>>> ---
>>> .../gh-4427-ffi-sandwich.test.lua | 51 +++++++++----------
>>> .../lj-flush-on-trace.test.lua | 51 +++++++++----------
>>> test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua | 7 +++
>>> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> <snipped>
>
>>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua
>>> index aebbf6ac..d2dd71b0 100644
>>> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua
>>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ local function luacmd(args)
>>> end
>>>
>>> function M.selfrun(arg, checks)
>>> + -- If TEST_SELFRUN is set, just execute the test payload below
>>
>> To make a symmetry to the next comment: "we’re running the io.popen version
>> of the test, proceed with test payload execution past "
>>
>>> + -- <selfrun> call, ...
>>> + if os.getenv('TEST_SELFRUN') then return end
>>> +
>>> + -- ... otherwise run this chunk via <io.popen>.
>>
>> I would add that the test payload won’t be run and the io.popen results
>> will be reported instead.
>
> I've adjusted the comments the following way:
>
> ================================================================================
>
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua
> index 9bdb71ec..c0403cf1 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/utils.lua
> @@ -25,11 +25,15 @@ local function unshiftenv(variable, value, sep)
> end
>
> function M.selfrun(arg, checks)
> - -- If TEST_SELFRUN is set, just execute the test payload below
> - -- <selfrun> call, ...
> + -- If TEST_SELFRUN is set, it means the test has been run via
> + -- <io.popen>, so just return from this routine and proceed
> + -- the execution to the test payload, ...
> if os.getenv('TEST_SELFRUN') then return end
>
> - -- ... otherwise run this chunk via <io.popen>.
> + -- ... otherwise initialize <tap>, setup testing environment
> + -- and run this chunk via <io.popen> for each case in <checks>.
> + -- XXX: The function doesn't return back from this moment. It
> + -- checks whether all assertions are fine and exits.
>
> local test = tap.test(arg[0]:match('/?(.+)%.test%.lua'))
>
>
> ================================================================================
>
>>
>>> +
>>> local test = tap.test(arg[0]:match('/?(.+)%.test%.lua'))
>>>
>>> test:plan(#checks)
>>> @@ -28,6 +34,7 @@ function M.selfrun(arg, checks)
>>> local cmd = string.gsub('LUA_PATH="<PATH>/?.lua;$LUA_PATH" ' ..
>>> 'LUA_CPATH="<PATH>/?.<SUFFIX>;$LUA_CPATH" ' ..
>>> 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH=<PATH>:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ' ..
>>> + 'TEST_SELFRUN=1' ..
>>> '<LUABIN> 2>&1 <SCRIPT>', '%<(%w+)>', vars)
>>>
>>> for _, ch in pairs(checks) do
>>> --
>>> 2.25.0
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> IM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20210407/41023d8f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list