[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/4] ci: integrate Jepsen tests to GitLab CI

[Sergey Bronnikov]

Hello!

Thanks for review! I made some changes according to your comments

and pushed them to the branch.

CI: https://gitlab.com/tarantool/tarantool/-/pipelines/191621859


On 17.09.2020 18:25, Alexander Turenko wrote:
>>> +jepsen:
>>> +  <<: *docker_test_definition
>>> +  script:
>>> +    - ${GITLAB_MAKE} test_jepsen
>>> +  stage: long_tests
>>> +  when: manual
>>> +  tags:
>>> +    - mcs_jepsen_docker
>>> +  artifacts:
>>> +    paths:
>>> +      - jepsen-tests-prefix/src/jepsen-tests/store
>>> +    expire_in: 1 week
>>> +
>> Let's use more time for artifacts store, may be 6 months.
> I agree. We sometimes return to bad results after some significant
> delay.

increased to 6 months:

--- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
+++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ jepsen:
    artifacts:
      paths:
        - jepsen-tests-prefix/src/jepsen-tests/store
-    expire_in: 1 week
+    expire_in: 6 month

  # ####
  # Perf

>
>>> -deps_debian:
>>> +deps_debian: $(BIN_DIR)/clojure $(BIN_DIR)/lein $(BIN_DIR)/terraform
>>>   	apt-get update ${APT_EXTRA_FLAGS} && apt-get install -y -f \
>>>   		build-essential cmake coreutils sed \
>>>   		libreadline-dev libncurses5-dev libyaml-dev libssl-dev \
>> I don't think we need to add jepsen's new targets to the base one, let's
>> move it to 'deps_debian_jepsen'.
> I agree, it is a bit strange to install jepsen dependencies for all jobs
> (when a separate jepsen goal exists at least).
>
Agree. Removed jepsen dependencies for deps_debian target.


>>> +deps_debian_jepsen:
>>> +	apt-get update ${APT_EXTRA_FLAGS} && apt-get install -y -f \
>>> +		openjdk-8-jre openjdk-8-jre-headless libjna-java gnuplot graphviz \
>>> +		zip unzip openssh-client jq
>>> +
>>> +$(BIN_DIR)/clojure: deps_debian_jepsen
>>> +	curl $(CLOJURE_URL) | sudo bash
>>> +
>>> +$(BIN_DIR)/lein: deps_debian_jepsen
>>> +	curl $(LEIN_URL) > $@
>>> +	chmod a+x $@
>>> +	$@ version
>>> +
>>> +$(BIN_DIR)/terraform: deps_debian_jepsen
>>> +	curl -O $(TERRAFORM_URL)
>>> +	unzip -o $(TERRAFORM_NAME) terraform -d $(dir $@)
>>> +	rm -f $(TERRAFORM_NAME)
>>> +
>> Do we really need standalone targets that will not be used in separate?
>> This file is in makefile style, but not makefile in real, it has
>> standalone targets that provides some process meanings, like:
>>   - prepare deps
>>   - build
>>   - test
> In my understanding it is Makefile anyway and it is usual for a Makefile
> to use a file name as a goal (so the goal will be considered as made if
> the file exists, if the goal is not marked as .PHONY).
>
>>> +
>>> +# ###################
>>> +# Jepsen testing
>>> +# ###################
>>> +
>>> +test_jepsen: deps_debian
>>> +	cmake . -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DENABLE_WERROR=ON
>>> +	make jepsen-single
>> Let's use deps_debian_jepsen here.

Done.


> I would do it this way, yep.