[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 5/6] qsync: implement direct write of CONFIRM/ROLLBACK into a journal

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

When we need to write CONFIRM or ROLLBACK message (which is just
a binary record in msgpack format) into a journal we use txn code
to allocate a new transaction, encode there a message and pass it
to walk the long txn path before it hit the journal. This is not
only resource wasting but also somehow strange from architectural
point of view.

Instead lets encode a record on the stack and write it to the journal
directly.

Closes #5129

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at gmail.com>
---
 src/box/txn_limbo.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/box/txn_limbo.c b/src/box/txn_limbo.c
index a74bfe244..d8cf6a6f6 100644
--- a/src/box/txn_limbo.c
+++ b/src/box/txn_limbo.c
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
 #include "txn_limbo.h"
 #include "replication.h"
 
+#include "iproto_constants.h"
+#include "journal.h"
+
 struct txn_limbo txn_limbo;
 
 static inline void
@@ -237,62 +240,73 @@ txn_limbo_wait_complete(struct txn_limbo *limbo, struct txn_limbo_entry *entry)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * A callback for synchronous write: txn_limbo_write fiber
+ * waiting to proceed once a record is written to WAL.
+ */
+static void
+txn_limbo_write_cb(struct journal_entry *entry)
+{
+	assert(entry->complete_data != NULL);
+	fiber_wakeup(entry->complete_data);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Write CONFIRM or ROLLBACK message to a journal directly
+ * without involving transaction engine because using txn
+ * engine is far from being cheap while we only need to
+ * write a small journal entry.
+ */
 static int
-txn_limbo_write_confirm_rollback(struct txn_limbo *limbo, int64_t lsn,
-				 bool is_confirm)
+txn_limbo_write(uint32_t replica_id, int64_t lsn, int type)
 {
+	assert(replica_id != REPLICA_ID_NIL);
+	assert(type == IPROTO_CONFIRM || type == IPROTO_ROLLBACK);
 	assert(lsn > 0);
 
+	/*
+	 * When allocated statically some compilers (such as
+	 * clang + asan) requires the journal_entry::rows to
+	 * be last in a container structure. So it it simplier
+	 * just to create a cummulative buffer.
+	 */
+	char buf[sizeof(struct journal_entry) +
+		 sizeof(struct xrow_header *)];
+
+	struct synchro_body_bin body_bin;
 	struct xrow_header row;
-	struct request request = {
-		.header = &row,
-	};
 
-	struct txn *txn = txn_begin();
-	if (txn == NULL)
-		return -1;
+	struct journal_entry *entry = (struct journal_entry *)buf;
+	entry->rows[0] = &row;
 
-	int res = 0;
-	if (is_confirm) {
-		res = xrow_encode_confirm(&row, &txn->region,
-					  limbo->instance_id, lsn);
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * This LSN is the first to be rolled back, so
-		 * the last "safe" lsn is lsn - 1.
-		 */
-		res = xrow_encode_rollback(&row, &txn->region,
-					   limbo->instance_id, lsn);
+	xrow_encode_synchro(&row, &body_bin, replica_id, lsn, type);
+
+	journal_entry_create(entry, 1, xrow_approx_len(&row),
+			     txn_limbo_write_cb, fiber());
+
+	if (journal_write(entry) != 0) {
+		diag_set(ClientError, ER_WAL_IO);
+		diag_log();
+		return -1;
 	}
-	if (res == -1)
-		goto rollback;
-	/*
-	 * This is not really a transaction. It just uses txn API
-	 * to put the data into WAL. And obviously it should not
-	 * go to the limbo and block on the very same sync
-	 * transaction which it tries to confirm now.
-	 */
-	txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC);
 
-	if (txn_begin_stmt(txn, NULL) != 0)
-		goto rollback;
-	if (txn_commit_stmt(txn, &request) != 0)
-		goto rollback;
+	if (entry->res < 0) {
+		diag_set(ClientError, ER_WAL_IO);
+		diag_log();
+		return -1;
+	}
 
-	return txn_commit(txn);
-rollback:
-	txn_rollback(txn);
-	return -1;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
  * Write a confirmation entry to WAL. After it's written all the
  * transactions waiting for confirmation may be finished.
  */
-static int
+static inline int
 txn_limbo_write_confirm(struct txn_limbo *limbo, int64_t lsn)
 {
-	return txn_limbo_write_confirm_rollback(limbo, lsn, true);
+	return txn_limbo_write(limbo->instance_id, lsn, IPROTO_CONFIRM);
 }
 
 void
@@ -338,10 +352,10 @@ txn_limbo_read_confirm(struct txn_limbo *limbo, int64_t lsn)
  * transactions following the current one and waiting for
  * confirmation must be rolled back.
  */
-static int
+static inline int
 txn_limbo_write_rollback(struct txn_limbo *limbo, int64_t lsn)
 {
-	return txn_limbo_write_confirm_rollback(limbo, lsn, false);
+	return txn_limbo_write(limbo->instance_id, lsn, IPROTO_ROLLBACK);
 }
 
 void
-- 
2.26.2