[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 2/4] recovery: allow to ignore rows coming from a certain instance

Serge Petrenko sergepetrenko at tarantool.org
Wed Feb 19 12:35:21 MSK 2020



> 19 февр. 2020 г., в 12:02, Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov at gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> * Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko at tarantool.org <mailto:sergepetrenko at tarantool.org>> [20/02/19 12:01]:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 19 февр. 2020 г., в 11:52, Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov at gmail.com> написал(а):
>>> 
>>> * Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko at tarantool.org> [20/02/19 11:45]:
>>>>> This is a strange way to mute rows from self. Why not set vclock
>>>>> component to infinity as I suggested multiple times? Why not
>>>>> respond to me with objection if my suggestion  can not be done?
>>>> 
>>>> I responded with a patch, so now we can discuss both your and my suggestions.
>>> 
>>> No, we can't. You responded with a patch for your suggestion, but
>>> not for mine. So we compare apples and oranges here. Just like
>>> with Ilya's patch, which only half way captured my suggestion in
>>> his "alternatives".
>>> 
>>> In the end I'm not even sure you got it right.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> If I understood you correctly, you suggested to set replica self lsn to infinity
>>>> (on master side), so that recovery on masters side would skip replicas rows.
>>>> 
>> 
>> Does it look like I got it right from my answer?
> 
> I don't understand. For example, what do you mean by setting it on
> the master? You were supposed to set it on the replica, when
> sending a SUBSCRIBE request to the master.

I mean taking replica clock from a subscribe request and setting replica_clock[replica->id] = INT64_MAX.
This is done on master in relay_subscribe() called from box_process_subscribe(). Then relay recovery is initialized
with this vclock making recovery skip rows coming from the replica itself.

I’m starting to think that you want me to mangle only with replicaset.applier.vclock
Sorry if I missed it in the very beginning of our discussion.

> Honestly, your English isn't perfect, we don't share the same
> vocabulary/terms, so it's hard to see what went wrong without a
> patch.

Ok, I’ll send a patch soon.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
> https://scylladb.com <https://scylladb.com/>

--
Serge Petrenko
sergepetrenko at tarantool.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20200219/ba48725b/attachment.html>


More information about the Tarantool-patches mailing list