[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6] memtx: fix out of memory handling for rtree

Nikita Pettik korablev at tarantool.org
Tue Feb 11 15:42:45 MSK 2020


On 11 Feb 13:51, Olga Arkhangelskaia wrote:
> Hi Nikita! Thanks for the review.
> 
> I have fixed everything you have pointed out. Diff can be found below.

LGTM
 
> 10.02.2020 14:18, Nikita Pettik пишет:
> > On 10 Feb 10:47, Olga Arkhangelskaia wrote:
>  diff --git a/src/box/index.cc b/src/box/index.cc
> -index 4e4867118..c2fc00867 100644
> +index 4e4867118..750838bef 100644
>  --- a/src/box/index.cc
>  +++ b/src/box/index.cc
> -@@ -733,6 +733,13 @@ int
> +@@ -733,6 +733,8 @@ int
>   generic_index_build_next(struct index *index, struct tuple *tuple)
> {
>         struct tuple *unused;
> -+ /*
> -+       * Note this is not no-op call in case of rtee index:
> -+       * reserving 0 bytes is required during rtree recovery.
> -+       * For details see memtx_rtree_index_reserve().
> -+ */
>  +      if (index_reserve(index, 0) != 0)
>  +              return -1;
> 
> diff --git a/src/box/memtx_rtree.c b/src/box/memtx_rtree.c
> -index 8badad797..612fcb2a9 100644
> +index 8badad797..a5cae8f45 100644
>  --- a/src/box/memtx_rtree.c
>  +++ b/src/box/memtx_rtree.c
> -@@ -242,6 +242,24 @@ memtx_rtree_index_replace(struct index *base, struct
> tuple *old_tuple,
> +@@ -242,6 +242,23 @@ memtx_rtree_index_replace(struct index *base, struct
> tuple *old_tuple,
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> @@ -82,14 +109,13 @@
>  +memtx_rtree_index_reserve(struct index *base, uint32_t size_hint)
>  +{
>  + /*
> -+         * In case of rtree we use reserve to make sure that
> -+         * memory allocation will not fail during any operation
> -+         * on rtree, because there is no error handling in the
> -+         * rtree lib.
> -+ */
> ++       * In case of rtree we use reserve to make sure that memory
> allocation
> ++       * will not fail durig any operationin rtree, because there is no
> ++       * error handling in rtree lib.
> ++ */
>  + (void)size_hint;
>  +      ERROR_INJECT(ERRINJ_INDEX_RESERVE, {
> -+              diag_set(OutOfMemory, MEMTX_EXTENT_SIZE, "mempool", "new
> slab");
> ++              diag_set(OutOfMemory, MEMTX_EXTENT_SIZE, "slab allocator",
> "memtx extent");
>  +              return -1;
>  + });
>  +      struct memtx_engine *memtx = (struct memtx_engine *)base->engine;
> 
>  diff --git a/test/box/errinj.test.lua b/test/box/errinj.test.lua
> -index 03c088677..63c8b19fe 100644
> +index 03c088677..598e7da33 100644
>  --- a/test/box/errinj.test.lua
>  +++ b/test/box/errinj.test.lua
> -@@ -620,3 +620,31 @@ box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_TIMEOUT', 0.5)
> +@@ -620,3 +620,30 @@ box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_TIMEOUT', 0.5)
> box.error.injection.get('ERRINJ_RELAY_TIMEOUT')
>   box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_RELAY_TIMEOUT', 0)
> box.error.injection.get('ERRINJ_RELAY_TIMEOUT')
>  +
>  +--
> -+-- gh-4619: make sure that if OOM takes place during rtree recovery,
> -+-- Tarantool instance will fail gracefully.
> ++-- gh-4619-RTREE-doesn't-handle-OOM-properly
>  +--
>  +test_run:cmd('create server rtree with script = "box/lua/cfg_rtree.lua"')
>  +test_run:cmd("start server rtree")


More information about the Tarantool-patches mailing list