[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 2/2] fiber: leak slab if unable to bring prots back
Alexander Turenko
alexander.turenko at tarantool.org
Thu Feb 6 14:10:42 MSK 2020
Okay except one style comment.
WBR, Alexander TUrenko.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:06:24AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> In case if we unable to revert guard page back to
> read|write we should never use such slab again.
>
> Initially I thought of just put panic here and
> exit but it is too destructive. I think better
> print an error and continue. If node admin ignore
I agree.
> this message then one moment at future there won't
> be slab left for use and creating new fibers get
> prohibited.
>
> In future (hopefully near one) we plan to drop
> guard pages to prevent VMA fracturing and use
> stack marks instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at gmail.com>
> ---
> src/lib/core/fiber.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib/core/fiber.c b/src/lib/core/fiber.c
> index 57e4cb6ef..5298541d4 100644
> --- a/src/lib/core/fiber.c
> +++ b/src/lib/core/fiber.c
> @@ -1055,15 +1055,21 @@ fiber_stack_destroy(struct fiber *fiber, struct slab_cache *slabc)
> * to setup the original protection back in
> * background.
> *
> + * For now lets keep such slab referenced and
> + * leaked: if mprotect failed we must not allow
> + * to reuse such slab with PROT_NONE'ed page
> + * inside.
> + *
> * Note that in case if we're called from
> * fiber_stack_create() the @mprotect_flags is
> * the same as the slab been created with, so
> * calling mprotect for VMA with same flags
> * won't fail.
> */
> - diag_log();
> - }
> - slab_put(slabc, fiber->stack_slab);
> + say_syserror("fiber: Can't put guard page to slab. "
> + "Leak %zu bytes", (size_t)fiber->stack_size);
> + } else
> + slab_put(slabc, fiber->stack_slab);
Usual way (AFAIK) is to use braces around both branches or neither of
them. Our code style mentions it, see [1] (from words 'Do not
unnecessarily use braces').
AFAIS there are exceptions across our code, but rules are rules :)
[1]: https://www.tarantool.io/en/doc/1.10/dev_guide/c_style_guide/
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list