[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: don't re-export libcurl.so/dylib symbols

[Kirill Yukhin]

Hello,

On 30 Dec 07:53, Alexander Turenko wrote:
> Export libcurl's symbols only when they are provided by tarantool
> itself: when the library is linked statically into the tarantool's
> executable. There is no much sense to export the symbols when we link
> against the library dynamically.
> 
> Regarding motivation of the change. Since 2.6.0-36-g29ec62891 ('Ensure
> all curl symbols are exported') the curl_multi_poll() function is
> exported from the tarantool executable. It leads to a failure in
> Homebrew's build, because there we link (dynamically) with a system
> libcurl. On Mac OS 10.15 it is libcurl 7.64.1, while the function
> appears since libcurl 7.66.0. So a linker reports the undefined symbol:
> `curl_multi_poll`.
> 
> Now the symbols are not exported at dynamic linking with libcurl, so the
> linker is happy.
> 
> This commit relaxes bounds for dynamic linking, but an attempt to link
> with libcurl older than 7.66.0 statically still leads to a linking
> failure. The box-tap/gh-5223-curl-exports.test.lua test still fails when
> tarantool is linked (dynamically) against an old libcurl.
> 
> It looks as the good compromise. When libcurl functionality is provided
> by tarantool itself, *all* functions listed in the test are present
> (otherwise a linker will complain). But tarantool does not enforce a
> newer libcurl version, when it just *uses* this functionality and don't
> provide it for modules and stored procedured. It is not tarantool's
> responsibility in the case.
> 
> We possibly should skip the box-tap/gh-5223-curl-exports.test.lua test
> when tarantool is built against libcurl dynamically or revisit the
> described approach. I'll leave it as possible follow up activity.
> 
> Fixes #5542

LGTM.
I've checked your patch into 2.6 and master.

--
Regards, Kirill Yukhin