[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 4/7] core: introduce new mem_L field
Sergey Kaplun
skaplun at tarantool.org
Sun Dec 27 20:44:09 MSK 2020
Igor,
Thanks for the review!
On 27.12.20, Igor Munkin wrote:
> Sergey,
>
> Thanks for the patch! I guess this commit can be squashed with the
> following (introducing memprof engine), since <mem_L> field is added
> only to make it work. Also consider my comments below.
>
> On 25.12.20, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > To determine currently allocating coroutine (that may not be equal to
> > currently executed one) a new field called mem_L is added to
> > global_State structure. This field is set on each allocation event and
> > stores the coroutine address that is used for allocation.
> >
> > Part of tarantool/tarantool#5442
> > ---
> > src/lj_gc.c | 2 ++
> > src/lj_obj.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/lj_gc.c b/src/lj_gc.c
> > index 44c8aa1..800fb2c 100644
> > --- a/src/lj_gc.c
> > +++ b/src/lj_gc.c
> > @@ -852,6 +852,8 @@ void *lj_mem_realloc(lua_State *L, void *p, GCSize osz, GCSize nsz)
> > {
> > global_State *g = G(L);
> > lua_assert((osz == 0) == (p == NULL));
> > +
> > + setgcref(g->mem_L, obj2gco(L));
>
> This field is initialized only here. What about <lj_mem_newgco> and
> <lj_mem_free>? As for the latter the initialization is not necessary,
> since all deallocations are reported as internals (but the comment
> strongly required), but this assignment is definitely lost in the first
> routine.
I'll squash this patch with the next as you recommended and send
v3 for that patch (5/7) in the reply to the cover.
>
> > p = g->allocf(g->allocd, p, osz, nsz);
> > if (p == NULL && nsz > 0)
> > lj_err_mem(L);
>
> <snipped>
>
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
> IM
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list