[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] test: fix local array access in heap_iterator unit test

[Kirill Yukhin]

Hello,

On 04 Dec 09:33, Aleksandr Lyapunov wrote:
> Hello! Thanks for the patch, see my comment below:
> 
> On 03.12.2020 17:38, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Index variable run from 1 to 5 and was used to index
> > array of size 4. Use iv - 1 instead.
> > 
> > Discovered by Coverity.
> > ---
> > 
> > Issue: N/A
> > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/kyukhin/fix-heap_iterator
> > CI: https://gitlab.com/tarantool/tarantool/-/pipelines/224811793
> > 
> >   test/unit/heap_iterator.c | 6 +++---
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/unit/heap_iterator.c b/test/unit/heap_iterator.c
> > index 4fde39d..3fcefff 100644
> > --- a/test/unit/heap_iterator.c
> > +++ b/test/unit/heap_iterator.c
> > @@ -111,15 +111,15 @@ test_iterator_small()
> >   		if (val < 1 || val > 5)
> Accessing below by [val - 1] is ok, but the main problem is that this check
> is wrong.
> If the heap works correctly - 'val' must be in range [1..4].
> I think we should fix to "val < 1 || val > 4".
> After that both variants of accessing array by [val] and [val - 1] would be
> ok.

I agree, thanks. Updated patch in the bottom. Branch force-pushed.
I've accidentally committed this version to master. So, this is iterative.

--
Regards, Kirill Yukhin

Author: Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin at tarantool.org>
Date:   Fri Dec 4 11:50:31 2020 +0300

    test: fixup unit/heap_iterator

    Accidentally committed [1] which was under review.
    This is proper fix.

    [1] - 86d41c348ae271f5a8a8dec6fdd4ccc045a0408d

diff --git a/test/unit/heap_iterator.c b/test/unit/heap_iterator.c
index 3fcefff..46723b3 100644
--- a/test/unit/heap_iterator.c
+++ b/test/unit/heap_iterator.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ test_iterator_small()
        }

        struct heap_iterator it;
-  bool used_key[5];
+       bool used_key[4];
        memset((void *)used_key, 0, sizeof(used_key));

        test_heap_iterator_init(&heap, &it);
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ test_iterator_small()
                if (value == NULL)
                        fail("NULL returned from iterator", "value == NULL");
                uint32_t val = value->val1;
-          if (val < 1 || val > 5)
+               if (val < 1 || val > 4)
                        fail("from iterator returned incorrect value",
-                       "val < 1 || val > 5");
+                            "val < 1 || val > 4");
                if (used_key[val - 1])
                        fail("from iterator some value returned twice",
                             "used[val]");
@@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ test_iterator_small()
        }

        bool f = true;
-  for (uint32_t i = 1; i < 5; ++i)
-          f = used_key[i - 1] && f;
+       for (uint32_t i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
+               f = used_key[i] && f;
        if (!f)
                fail("some node was skipped", "!f");