[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2] build: refactor static build process
Alexander Turenko
alexander.turenko at tarantool.org
Tue Aug 25 17:51:03 MSK 2020
I looked very briefly (not thoroughly at all) on this iteration.
There is nothing that confuses me (except few tiny comments below).
I hope Igor will do thorough review.
WBR, Alexander Turenko.
> +if (APPLE)
> + find_program(C_COMPILER clang)
> + find_program(CXX_COMPILER clang++)
> +else()
> + find_program(C_COMPILER gcc)
> + find_program(CXX_COMPILER g++)
> +endif()
Can we just leave it default?
In offline discussion Alexandr B. said that tarantool builds with gcc,
but icu with clang that gives some problem.
Possible solution is to pass ${CMAKE_C_COMPILER} (and CXX too where
necessary) to a subproject as we do for c-ares and curl. It seems it is
already done, so maybe it worth to re-check whether it solves the
problem.
Anyway, if we really need to set a compiler here explicitly, I don't
mind. Just noted that this way is somewhat unusual as I see.
> diff --git a/static-build/test/static-build/box.lua b/static-build/test/static-build/box.lua
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000..bad8a9055
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/static-build/test/static-build/box.lua
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/env tarantool
> +
> +require('console').listen(os.getenv('ADMIN'))
Is looks redundant, see the comment below.
> diff --git a/static-build/test/static-build/suite.ini b/static-build/test/static-build/suite.ini
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..92e349466
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/static-build/test/static-build/suite.ini
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +[default]
> +core = app
> +description = Static build tests
> +script = box.lua
> +is_parallel = True
'script' does not have sense for 'core = app' test, it is for 'core =
tarantool' tests.
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list