[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] wal: wal memory buffer

[Konstantin Osipov]

* Georgy Kirichenko <georgy at tarantool.org> [19/09/20 11:13]:
> > 20. Why not to pass count instead of end pointer? Count is known in the
> > caller function wal_write_to_disk(), and you calculate count below
> > using 'end - begin' anyway.
> I inherited the API from wal_assing_lsn, and it does not matter, I will do 
> that if you wish.

It's the general convention across the rest of the code to pass
arrays as a pair of pointers.


-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia