[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/2] fiber: reset clock stats on fiber.top_enable()
Serge Petrenko
sergepetrenko at tarantool.org
Mon Nov 18 19:11:22 MSK 2019
Hi! Thankyou for reviewing this.
I’ve managed to finally find the cause of test failures.
It is fixed in the second patch of the newly sent series.
I addressed your comments and resent v3.
--
Serge Petrenko
sergepetrenko at tarantool.org
> 16 нояб. 2019 г., в 0:39, Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy at tarantool.org> написал(а):
>
> Hi! Thanks for the fixes!
>
> See 2 comments below.
>
> On 15/11/2019 15:58, Serge Petrenko wrote:
>> We didn't refresh last remembered clock on fiber.top_enable()
>> This means that the fiber issuing fiber.top_enable() would get a huge
>> chunk of cpu time on its first yield. Fix this.
>> Also reset clock_delta and cpu_miss_count.
>>
>> If fiber.top() is issued on the same ev loop iteration as
>> fiber.top_enable(), clock_delta_last is 0 for both cord and all the
>> fibers, so report "instant" and "average" stats per last iteration as 0
>> instead of NaN.
>>
>> Follow-up #2694
>> ---
>> src/lib/core/fiber.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/lua/fiber.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/lib/core/fiber.c b/src/lib/core/fiber.c
>> index aebaba7f0..258c094f5 100644
>> --- a/src/lib/core/fiber.c
>> +++ b/src/lib/core/fiber.c
>> @@ -1203,9 +1203,30 @@ fiber_top_enable()
>> ev_check_start(cord()->loop, &cord()->check_event);
>> fiber_top_enabled = true;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Reset cord and fiber clock stats in order to
>> + * count from zero even on reenable.
>> + */
>> cord()->clock_acc = 0;
>> cord()->cpu_miss_count_last = 0;
>> cord()->clock_delta_last = 0;
>> + cord()->clock_delta = 0;
>> +
>> + struct fiber * fiber;
>> + rlist_foreach_entry(fiber, &cord()->alive, link) {
>> + fiber->clock_acc = 0;
>> + fiber->clock_delta_last = 0;
>> + fiber->clock_delta = 0;
>> + fiber->cputime = 0;
>
> 1. fiber_reset() should do exactly the same, right?
> Then why doesn't it nullify clock_delta_last?
I just didn’t notice that, sorry.
>
> This mess with numerous time fields, and their reset,
> looks like a necessity to create a new structure,
> which would be included into cord and fiber structures.
> And which would provide methods for cleaning and
> updating the members.
Done.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + cord()->sched.clock_acc = 0;
>> + cord()->sched.clock_delta_last = 0;
>> + cord()->sched.clock_delta = 0;
>> + cord()->sched.cputime = 0;
>> +
>> + cord()->clock_last = __rdtscp(&cord()->cpu_id_last);
>> + cord()->cpu_miss_count = 0;
>> struct timespec ts;
>> if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID, &ts) != 0) {
>> say_debug("clock_gettime(): failed to get this"
>> diff --git a/src/lua/fiber.c b/src/lua/fiber.c
>> index 8b3b22e55..647505643 100644
>> --- a/src/lua/fiber.c
>> +++ b/src/lua/fiber.c
>> @@ -335,11 +335,19 @@ lbox_fiber_top_entry(struct fiber *f, void *cb_ctx)
>> lua_newtable(L);
>>
>> lua_pushliteral(L, "average");
>> - lua_pushnumber(L, f->clock_acc / (double)cord()->clock_acc * 100);
>> + if (cord()->clock_acc)
>
> 2. Sorry for a nit, we usually compare with 0
> explicitly, '!= 0', and avoid implicit casts.
No problem. Fixed.
>
>> + lua_pushnumber(L, f->clock_acc / (double)cord()->clock_acc * 100);
>> + else
>> + lua_pushnumber(L, 0);
>> lua_settable(L, -3);
>> +
>> lua_pushliteral(L, "instant");
>> - lua_pushnumber(L, f->clock_delta_last / (double)cord()->clock_delta_last * 100);
>> + if (cord()->clock_delta_last)
>> + lua_pushnumber(L, f->clock_delta_last / (double)cord()->clock_delta_last * 100);
>> + else
>> + lua_pushnumber(L, 0);
>> lua_settable(L, -3);
>> +
>> lua_pushliteral(L, "time");
>> lua_pushnumber(L, f->cputime / (double) FIBER_TIME_RES);
>> lua_settable(L, -3);
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20191118/cdb7460b/attachment.html>
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list