[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] Offload tx_prio processing to a fiber

[Konstantin Osipov]

* Georgy Kirichenko <georgy at tarantool.org> [19/05/23 11:48]:

I appreciate you don't use a fiber_call() or fiber_wakeup() 
right from the callback,

In other places we actually use fiber_wakeup(). Please see gc.c,
memtx_engine.c and others.

So please let's not use has_message/cond, simply wakeup the fiber
in question.

More comments as to why you need to run these in a fiber would not
harm.

-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia