[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sql: transactional DDL

[Konstantin Osipov]

* Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy at tarantool.org> [19/07/20 01:52]:
> index 000000000..8f7f91151
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/sql/ddl.result
> @@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
> +-- test-run result file version 2
> +test_run = require('test_run').new()
> + | ---
> + | ...
> +engine = test_run:get_cfg('engine')
> + | ---

Just curious why did you choose  Lua test format and not SQL?

Now that SQL format is in place my personal preference would be is
that it is used for SQL tests whenever possible, to improve
readability (SQL syntax highlighting, autocompletion).

What do you miss in SQL tests format?

I personally only miss anonymous sql/psm blocks and loops.


-- 
Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia