[PATCH 4/6] txn: do not require space id for nop requests
Vladimir Davydov
vdavydov.dev at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 12:13:16 MSK 2018
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:45:09PM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> * Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev at gmail.com> [18/06/13 20:40]:
> > Currently, IPROTO_NOP can only be generated by a before_replace trigger,
> > when it returns the old tuple thus turning the original operation into a
> > NOP. In such a case we know the space id and we write it to the request
> > body. This allows us to dispatch NOP requests via DML route.
> >
> > As a part of replica local spaces feature, we will substitute requests
> > operating on local spaces with NOP in relay in order to promote vclock
> > on replicas without actual data modification. Since space_id is stored
> > in request body, sending it to replicas would mean decoding the request
> > body in relay, which is an overkill. To avoid that, let's separate NOP
> > and DML paths and remove space_id from NOP requests.
>
> LGTM, a few comments below.
>
> > @@ -277,6 +277,11 @@ apply_row(struct xstream *stream, struct xrow_header *row)
> > (void) stream;
> > struct request request;
> > xrow_decode_dml_xc(row, &request, dml_request_key_map(row->type));
> > + if (request.type == IPROTO_NOP) {
> > + if (txn_commit_nop(&request) != 0)
> > + diag_raise();
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> txn_commit_nop() -> box_process_nop() or process_nop().
But txn_commit_nop() lives in txn.c. That's why I called it like that.
>
> > @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ request_create_from_tuple(struct request *request, struct space *space,
> > struct tuple *old_tuple, struct tuple *new_tuple)
> > {
> > memset(request, 0, sizeof(*request));
> > - request->space_id = space->def->id;
> >
> > if (old_tuple == new_tuple) {
> > /*
> > @@ -61,6 +60,7 @@ request_create_from_tuple(struct request *request, struct space *space,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > + request->space_id = space->def->id;
>
> Please add a comment
> /*
> * Space pointer may be zero in case of NOP, in which case this
> * line is not reached.
> */
OK.
>
> You changed a lot of code making it more NOP friendly, for example
> txn_begin_in_engine() now works even if there is already a
> transaction which has a NOP statement. This seems like a bug fix
> with no test.
This is not a bug fix: before this patch there couldn't be a transaction
without engine, because NOP requests also had engine set as they needed
a space.
> Could you please add a test?
The code is already covered by tests. See replication/before_replace,
box/before_replace.
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list